None / Negligible
Joseph Miller
Karma: 758
Net positive
Poll: What effect have protests calling for a pause / stop / deceleration on the development of AI had on the world?
a) Net positive
b) None / Negligible
c) Net negativeThis poll will be used to resolve this prediction market.
Vote by agree reacting to one of my comments below. Only vote once!
60 U.K. Lawmakers Accuse Google of Breaking AI Safety Pledge
FWIW I have personally said something close to “If I donate enough money to effective animal charities, I’ll save more animals than I would by going vegan. So, I don’t need to personally stop consuming animal products.”
And after reading this article, I still stand by that position.
See ai-plans.com
Announcing PauseCon, the PauseAI conference.
Three days of workshops, panels, and discussions, culminating in our biggest protest to date.
Twitter: https://x.com/PauseAI/status/1915773746725474581
Apply now: https://pausecon.org
PauseCon London 2025
<negativity>
This is cool, but the 10% Pledge is for life. If you’re primarily motivated by current events you may find it difficult to stick to your pledge 10 years from now.
</negativity>This is really great! Giving to charity is awesome and it’s especially impactful right now!
The next international PauseAI protest is taking place in one week in London, New York, Stockholm (Sunday 9th Feb), Paris (Mon 10 Feb) and many other cities around the world.
We are calling for AI Safety to be the focus of the upcoming Paris AI Action Summit. If you’re on the fence, take a look at Why I’m doing PauseAI.
Great point! Off the cuff I don’t think this massively changes considerations for PauseAI, but I’ll need to think about this.
Yep, maybe. I’m responding specifically to the vibe that this particular pre-print should make us more scared about AI.
As a technical person: AI is scary but this paper in particular is a nothing-burger. See my other comments.
No, there is no interesting new method here, it’s using LLM scaffolding to copy some files and run a script. It can only duplicate itself within the machine it has been given access to.
In order for AI to spread like a virus it would have to have some way to access new sources of compute, for which it would need be able to get money or the ability to hack into other servers. Neither of which current LLMs appear to be capable of.
Successful self-replication under no human assistance is the essential step for
AI to outsmart the human beingsThis seems clearly false. Replication (under their operationalization) is just another programming task that is not especially difficult. There’s no clear link between this task and self improvement, which would be a much harder ML task requiring very different types of knowledge and actions.
However, I do separately think we have passed the level of capabilities where it is responsible to keep improving AIs.
I’m confused why the comments aren’t more about cause prioritization as that’s the primary choice here. Maybe that’s too big of a discussion for this comment section.
This just seems like another annoying spam / marketing email. I basically never want any unnecessary emails from any company ever.
EA co-working spaces are the most impactful EA infrastructure that I’m aware of. And they are mostly underfunded.
This is particularly relevant given the recent letter from Anthropic on SB-1047.
I would like to see a steelman of the letter since it appears to me to significantly undermine Anthropic’s entire raison d’etre (which I understood to be: “have a seat at the table by being one of the big players—use this power to advocate for safer AI policies”). And I haven’t yet heard anyone in the AI Safety community defending it.
Net negative