Non-zero-sum James

Crabs in a Bucket ~ Or Links in a Chain

• Non-zero-sum James 11 Feb 2024 23:07 UTC

  1 point

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Luke Freeman’s comment on: A Kind­ness Equa­tion ~ should I give to char­ity or vol­un­teer?

  Thanks Luke!

What are Non-Zero-Sum games? ~ an introduction

A Kind­ness Equa­tion ~ should I give to char­ity or vol­un­teer?

Mo­ral Li­cens­ing ~ the mak­ings of a very nega­tive-sum game?

• Non-zero-sum James 6 Feb 2024 22:42 UTC

  1 point

  0 ∶ 0

  on: Against Longter­mism: I wel­come our robot over­lords, and you should too!

  Hey Matt, I thought this was really interesting. I think the mistake people make is seeing saving lives as a very isolated (subjective) good, which is at odds with collective goods (zero-sum thinking), when actually saving lives has a load of other cumulative benefits also. For instance lowering infant mortality lowers the birth rate, mitigating overpopulation, not having family members die is better for people’s mental health and productivity, and not being starving also means people can reach their potential, contributing more to the world as a whole.

  Those people who don’t die, and aren’t starving might very well be those that solve the asteroid crisis. I’ve always been a Karl Popper fan for this very reason, that quantifiable goods in the here and now don’t necessarily contradict distant unquantifiable goods, in fact, as you lock in piecemeal rights and well-being factors for people, that layer of security can be built upon, making future benefits more likely.