Downvoted because I’d prefer not to turn the situation into a one-dimensional tribal conflict of “support or oppose Bostrom”, which this post feeds into. I support you expressing your opinions, though, so would encourage a more descriptive title.
I’ve also downvoted other things that promote one-dimensional tribalist conflict on this issue. In general I don’t support escalation to even-more-clearly-defined battle lines; this is precisely how conflicts become worse.
Downvoted because I’d prefer not to turn the situation into a one-dimensional tribal conflict of “support or oppose Bostrom”, which this post feeds into. I support you expressing your opinions, though, so would encourage a more descriptive title.
This post was written in part because a tribal narrative of opposing Bostrom seemed to be dominating the forum zeitgeist.
I’ve also downvoted other things that promote one-dimensional tribalist conflict on this issue. In general I don’t support escalation to even-more-clearly-defined battle lines; this is precisely how conflicts become worse.
Fair enough. The damage has already been done, so I’ll leave the title of the post as is.
Noting for the record that I read this post after these comments were written, and other people will as well.
I’ve updated the title.
Congrats on updating! (Your mind not the title.)