FWIW, if capacity is an issue (which wouldn’t surprise me), I would much rather have a simple list of the grants, amounts, and the title of each grant than no report at all. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good!
Also, if capacity is an issue, are you planning on hiring someone?
If they have rough notes, they could hire someone to clean them up and publish them.
Also, I think they should publish the cost-effectiveness bars they’re trying to meet.
Regarding the cost-effectiveness bar, this discussion from our AMA last year might be interesting.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
FWIW, if capacity is an issue (which wouldn’t surprise me), I would much rather have a simple list of the grants, amounts, and the title of each grant than no report at all. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good!
Also, if capacity is an issue, are you planning on hiring someone?
If they have rough notes, they could hire someone to clean them up and publish them.
Also, I think they should publish the cost-effectiveness bars they’re trying to meet.
Regarding the cost-effectiveness bar, this discussion from our AMA last year might be interesting.