I’m excited by the prospect of Polis, but it’s frustratingly limited. The system has no notion of whether people are agreeing with a statement because it’s convincing or bridging the gap, or because it’s banal.
In this case… I don’t think we’re really undergoing any factionalization about this? In that case, should we not just try talking more… that usually works pretty well with us.
I’m excited by the prospect of Polis, but it’s frustratingly limited. The system has no notion of whether people are agreeing with a statement because it’s convincing or bridging the gap, or because it’s banal.
In this case… I don’t think we’re really undergoing any factionalization about this? In that case, should we not just try talking more… that usually works pretty well with us.
Talking is a great idea in general, but it seems there are some opinions in this survey suggesting that there are barriers to talking openly?
I believe the forum allows commenting anonymously, though I wouldn’t know how to access that feature.
Psuedonyms would be a bit better, but it’ll do.
As far as I know, the supported way to comment anonymously is to make an anonymous account