Error
Unrecognized LW server error:
Field "fmCrosspost" of type "CrosspostOutput" must have a selection of subfields. Did you mean "fmCrosspost { ... }"?Unrecognized LW server error:
Field "fmCrosspost" of type "CrosspostOutput" must have a selection of subfields. Did you mean "fmCrosspost { ... }"?
As a datapoint—I haven’t got round to reporting my donations for a few years.
Yeah, I also don’t report despite continuing to make my pledge donations. It doesn’t feel like a core part of the pledge to me.
Same, I also decided my comparative advantage isn’t to give to registered charities but to more idiosyncratic one-off stuff (though this isn’t always enough to add up to 10%)
I mean, reporting isn’t (and hasn’t been) part of the pledge while giving is, so that makes sense!
I have also barely reported, despite keeping the pledge for 10 years. Will finally get my reckoning with missing out on the pin though...
Thanks for writing this! I’ve been wondering about these numbers for a while, and it’s nice to see that retention is higher than I feared (for such a weighty commitment w/no serious enforcement).
This is also a good reminder for me to update the last few years of my GWWC records next time I donate, since I’ve become part of the problem :-(
It’s interesting that the year 0 reporting rate has changed so much recently. I wonder if there is less focus on students?
I think it’s also that more people report by default in year 0 because more new pledgers use the donation platform (thus reporting donations automatically) rather than doing manual reporting.
Makes sense, good point!
Eyeballing the chart, it seems like more than a “years since pledge” dependence, there’s a “actual year” dependence independent of the pledge year, at least after year 0. The most stark change is from 2010 to 2011, when reporting rates increased significantly for both of the first two cohorts. I’m guessing that this is due to some technicality rather than an actual behavior change. There also seems to be a significant decay across all cohorts from 2015 to 2016 that would likely be even more obvious if plotted. Maybe this also has a boring explanation, or maybe it has to do with identifiable events in 2016.