Interesting, thanks. Iām not sure whether I overall agree, but I think this glimpse of your models on this topic will be useful to me.
One clarifying question:
Instead of having 10 shallow takes on immediately actionable question X, Iād rather have 10 thorough takes on different subquestions Y_1, ā¦, Y_10
My first thought was āBut wait, wouldnāt 10 thorough takes take more time than 10 shallow takes, making this comparison unfair?ā But now I think maybe you meant both sets of investigations to take a similar amount of time, but the former to be āshallowā in relation to the larger topicāi.e., the āshallow takesā involve the same amount of total analysis as the āthorough takesā, but theyāre analysing such a big topic that they can only provide a shallow look at each component. Is that right?
the āshallow takesā involve the same amount of total analysis as the āthorough takesā, but theyāre analysing such a big topic that they can only provide a shallow look at each component
Yes, thatās what I had in mind. Thanks for clarifying!
Interesting, thanks. Iām not sure whether I overall agree, but I think this glimpse of your models on this topic will be useful to me.
One clarifying question:
My first thought was āBut wait, wouldnāt 10 thorough takes take more time than 10 shallow takes, making this comparison unfair?ā But now I think maybe you meant both sets of investigations to take a similar amount of time, but the former to be āshallowā in relation to the larger topicāi.e., the āshallow takesā involve the same amount of total analysis as the āthorough takesā, but theyāre analysing such a big topic that they can only provide a shallow look at each component. Is that right?
Yes, thatās what I had in mind. Thanks for clarifying!
Iām confusedādid you make this comment in the wrong place?
No, but there was a copy and paste error that made the comment unintelligible. Edited now. Thanks for flagging!