Error
Unrecognized LW server error:
Field "fmCrosspost" of type "CrosspostOutput" must have a selection of subfields. Did you mean "fmCrosspost { ... }"?Unrecognized LW server error:
Field "fmCrosspost" of type "CrosspostOutput" must have a selection of subfields. Did you mean "fmCrosspost { ... }"?
See comparison here.
Iām not sure about the penalty. Iām also not sure if Iām a fan of the current penalty system for community posts.
I have suggested this because we wanted to have a list of ācontent writingā tasks in EA Israel for members who wish to contribute. I think that this list of posts the community wants someone to write is a good example for doing that, but has some drawbacks (itās an old post which people donāt see as often or donāt expect high visibility/āengagement, and it might be harder to see if some request has been completed).
Perhaps it would be better to start only with content-creation requests.
To filter requests that deal specifically with posts we wish to see, we can add tags like āpost-requestā and then people can filter by both tags.
What do you think about this? Should we try it out?
Do you have better mechanisms?
Iām somewhat interested. I think we should also try to provide a bit of info on why we want help on the topic and any time limit. āwantedāa breakdown of Russ Robertās worldview and disagreements with EA because Iām curiousā is totally valid but lower priority than āwantedāa breakdown of Russ Robertās worldview and disagreements with EA to look for important criticisms of EA, because next month Iāll be starting a project to look for solutions to those criticismsā
Iād propose trying this exactly as you described but without the extra default-tag. As mentioned in a private discussion recently, Iām keen to keep the default number of tags small. Too many draws the eye for distraction. When youāre just getting started, I know the site is actually a fair bit complex, and distraction hurts your ability to figure it out in the back of your head when youāre mainly looking at content.
š
Iāll try to open
requests (open)andrequests (closed)and see if it clicks :)At first glance, I like the general idea, as well as the specific proposed mechanism. (This doesnāt mean I think itās the best mechanism possibleāI havenāt tried to think of alternatives.)
And trying it seems probably low-cost.
This idea seems to overlap with the Get Involved tag, and many posts might warrant both tags, but I think the scope/āuse of the two tags is distinct enough that making this new one makes sense.