RSS

Bayes’ Theorem

TagLast edit: 25 Apr 2022 22:00 UTC by Leo

Bayes’ Theorem (also known as Bayes’ Rule or Bayes’ Law) is a law of probability that describes the proper way to incorporate new evidence into prior probabilities to form an updated probability estimate. It is commonly regarded as the foundation of consistent rational reasoning under uncertainty. Bayes’ Theorem is named after Reverend Thomas Bayes, who proved the theorem in 1763.

Bayes’ theorem commonly takes the form:

where A is the proposition of interest, B is the observed evidence, P(A) and P(B) are prior probabilities, and P(A|B) is the posterior probability of A.

With the posterior odds, the prior odds and the likelihood ratio written explicitly, the theorem reads:

Visualization of Bayes’ Rule

Further reading

Alexander Kruel (2010) A guide to Bayes’ theorem – A few links, Alexander Kruel’s Blog, February 27.

Arbital (2021) Bayes’ rule: Guide, Arbital.

Bonilla, Oscar (2009) Visualizing Bayes theorem, Oscar Bonilla’s Blog, May 1.

Joyce, James (2003) Bayes’ theorem, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, June 28 (updated 12 August 2021).

Oracle Aide (2012) A Venn pie (using Venn pies to illustrate Bayes’ theorem), Oracle Aide, December 26.

Wikipedia (2002) Bayes’ theorem, Wikipedia, April 18 (updated 3 August 2021‎).

Wikipedia (2004) Base rate fallacy, Wikipedia, June 17 (updated 17 June 2021‎).

Yudkowsky, Eliezer S. (2003) An intuitive explanation of Bayes’ theorem, Eliezer S. Yudkowsky’s Website, (updated 4 June 2006).

Related entries

Bayesian epistemology | credence | epistemology

[Linkpost] Michael Hue­mer on the case for Bayesian statistics

John G. Halstead7 Feb 2023 17:52 UTC
20 points
2 comments1 min readEA link

Solu­tions to prob­lems with Bayesianism

Bob Jacobs 🔸4 Nov 2023 12:15 UTC
27 points
2 comments21 min readEA link

Anec­dotes Can Be Strong Ev­i­dence and Bayes The­o­rem Proves It

FCCC13 Mar 2022 4:37 UTC
15 points
5 comments4 min readEA link

Bayes’ The­o­rem explained

Tomer_Goloboy28 Mar 2022 0:40 UTC
4 points
1 comment1 min readEA link

Why GiveWell should use com­plete un­cer­tainty quantification

Tanae27 Dec 2022 20:11 UTC
32 points
1 comment1 min readEA link
(suboptimal.substack.com)