GiveWell Change Our Mind Contest

TagLast edit: 5 Oct 2022 14:04 UTC by Lizka

The GiveWell Change Our Mind Contest is a contest that encourages critiques of GiveWell’s cost-effectiveness analyses that could lead to substantial improvements in their overall allocation of funds.

Announcing the Change Our Mind Contest for critiques of our cost-effectiveness analyses

GiveWell6 Sep 2022 18:10 UTC

142 points

6 comments1 min readEA link

(blog.givewell.org)

Deworming and decay: replicating GiveWell’s cost-effectiveness analysis

JoelMcGuire25 Jul 2022 20:26 UTC

307 points

38 comments11 min readEA link

(www.happierlivesinstitute.org)

A dozen doubts about GiveWell’s numbers

JoelMcGuire1 Nov 2022 2:25 UTC

134 points

18 comments19 min readEA link

(www.happierlivesinstitute.org)

Quantifying Uncertainty in GiveWell’s GiveDirectly Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

SamNolan27 May 2022 3:10 UTC

130 points

19 comments7 min readEA link

SoGive review of GiveWell’s discount rates

SoGive1 Nov 2022 12:52 UTC

17 points

1 comment16 min readEA link

A critical review of GiveWell’s 2022 cost-effectiveness model

Froolow25 Aug 2022 15:35 UTC

227 points

20 comments35 min readEA link

GiveWell should fund an SMC replication

Seth Ariel Green28 Oct 2022 12:31 UTC

90 points

17 comments5 min readEA link

AMF net use may be overestimated by about 10 percentage points

brb24310 Oct 2022 23:05 UTC

23 points

3 comments2 min readEA link

The winners of the Change Our Mind Contest—and some reflections

GiveWell15 Dec 2022 19:33 UTC

192 points

10 comments9 min readEA link

(blog.givewell.org)

Quantifying Uncertainty in GiveWell Cost-Effectiveness Analyses

SamNolan31 Oct 2022 14:31 UTC

116 points

7 comments20 min readEA link

(observablehq.com)

GiveWell Misuses Discount Rates

OscarD27 Oct 2022 6:57 UTC

73 points

12 comments4 min readEA link

How We Plan to Approach Uncertainty in Our Cost-Effectiveness Models

GiveWell2 Jan 2024 21:09 UTC

92 points

26 comments23 min readEA link

(www.givewell.org)

Millions in cash transfers, without spending a penny

Karthik Tadepalli26 Oct 2022 20:03 UTC

18 points

1 comment6 min readEA link

Donations to SCI Foundation may funge with other work

SoGive1 Nov 2022 12:52 UTC

10 points

1 comment8 min readEA link

GiveWell’s Moral Weights Underweight the Value of Transfers to the Poor

Trevor Woolley13 Dec 2022 7:23 UTC

83 points

0 comments5 min readEA link

GiveWell’s approach to supplementary adjustments uses questionable priors

SoGive1 Nov 2022 12:53 UTC

11 points

1 comment19 min readEA link

Hard Problems in GiveWell’s Moral Weights Approach

Tanae1 Nov 2022 4:51 UTC

36 points

3 comments9 min readEA link

GiveWell’s Uncertainty Problem

noahhaber28 Oct 2022 7:36 UTC

15 points

4 comments1 min readEA link

(docs.google.com)

Critiquing GiveWell’s Model of Economic Effects from Health Interventions

Joseph Richardson28 Oct 2022 17:42 UTC

25 points

2 comments8 min readEA link

Is there more to life than survival and income?

brb24313 Oct 2022 21:56 UTC

15 points

7 comments5 min readEA link

GiveDirectly’s cost-effectiveness could be 6.7x higher

Carolina Toth3 Nov 2022 4:39 UTC

21 points

3 comments2 min readEA link

(docs.google.com)

EA & LW Forums Weekly Summary (5 − 11 Sep 22’)

Zoe Williams12 Sep 2022 23:21 UTC

36 points

0 comments14 min readEA link

Responding to recent critiques of iron fortification in India

e19brendan12 Oct 2022 18:01 UTC

45 points

6 comments12 min readEA link

Simple Tips for Sound Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

James Broughel1 Nov 2022 0:53 UTC

3 points

1 comment4 min readEA link

GiveWell should use shorter TAI timelines

OscarD27 Oct 2022 6:59 UTC

52 points

6 comments3 min readEA link

A response to a Change Our Mind Contest entry on iron fortification programs in India

GiveWell25 Oct 2023 21:34 UTC

91 points

2 comments19 min readEA link

An Examination of GiveWell’s Water Quality Intervention Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

MHR1 Nov 2022 1:00 UTC

50 points

4 comments18 min readEA link

Review of Givewell’s Cost-effectiveness for Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention

Finngoeslong25 Sep 2022 13:59 UTC

20 points

3 comments4 min readEA link

What Peter Singer Got Wrong (And Where Give Well Could Improve)

LiaH14 Oct 2022 16:15 UTC

4 points

3 comments6 min readEA link

Sign of quality of life in GiveWell’s analyses

brb24316 Oct 2022 14:54 UTC

57 points

19 comments3 min readEA link

Cost-effectiveness of iron fortification in India is lower than GiveWell’s estimates

Akash Kulgod30 Sep 2022 12:50 UTC

28 points

2 comments10 min readEA link

No comments.