evanprice

• evanprice 17 Feb 2023 14:50 UTC

  16 points

  3 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Jack Lewars’s comment on: In (mild) defence of the so­cial/​pro­fes­sional over­lap in EA

  Thanks Jack, I found this to be a very pragmatic and fair approach. Maybe the community health team could develop a suggested policy document for personal relationships within the professional context using this as a starting basis.

• evanprice 24 Oct 2022 2:57 UTC

  1 point

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Amy Labenz’s comment on: Hik­ing: an anal­ogy for sus­tain­able work

  Thanks Amy, I find your perspectives here really helpful and insightful, much appreciated...**goes off to talk to team**!

• evanprice 18 Oct 2022 1:37 UTC

  1 point

  0 ∶ 0

  on: Hik­ing: an anal­ogy for sus­tain­able work

  Hey Amy
  
  Thanks for this post and the tangible metaphor.
  
  I’m having this issue on my team at the moment and the issue I’m struggling with is how to approach remuneration—does the person working 60hrs get paid for the same amount of work as the one doing 40hrs (I.e. Are they both salaried regardless of the amount they work).
  If yes, does that not risk demoralizing the former. And if no, then does that not create a culture of incentivizing working hours far beyond the regular 40hr week?
  Any insights would be much appreciated.

• evanprice 6 Jun 2022 3:35 UTC

  3 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: ChanaMessinger’s comment on: Or­ga­ni­za­tions pri­ori­tis­ing neat sig­nals of EA al­ign­ment might sys­tem­at­i­cally miss good can­di­dates

  They did indeed ask such questions and I answered them indicating I had been engaged with EA for over four years and had made a career change as a result.

  Given the much more positive response to my applications since I made significant progress on having the required signals, I am reasonably convinced that it is a case of requiring these signals to progress with most EA applications.

• evanprice 9 May 2022 19:14 UTC

  2 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: How To Get an EA-al­igned Job: My Experience

  Hey Sofia
  I was just preparing for an interview and thought I’d search the forum in case anyone had written up anything useful...and there was your really extensive, considered and helpful post!!

  
  Thank you so much for taking the time to write this up, it’s really helpful and much appreciated!

• evanprice 21 Apr 2022 20:29 UTC

  12 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: Longter­mist EA needs more Phase 2 work

  I have been ruminating about this issue within EA for ages, and recently got the opportunity to speak to people about it at EAG and was somewhat alarmed at hearing quite half-hearted responses to the question—So thank you for writing this up in an accessible way.

  I think as you were suggesting in ‘virtuous cycles’, phase 2 work (or research) could come to significantly affect phase 1 work.
  E.g. If phase 2 research or work on AI alignment came to find that influencing the other groups developing AI to implement the successful phase 1 work is not feasible (foreign governments for example), then it may trigger a reconfiguration of what phase 1 work needs to look like. I.e. is the intention of phase 1 to solve the alignment problem or does it have to become to solve alignment and be the first to develop AGI (excuse my superficial knowledge on AI alignment, the example, not the details, are what’s relevant!)

  I’ve also heard from a phase 2 type AI group that they have struggled to get funding and that there are very few people working in this area, suggesting again that your point is very valid and worth attention.

• evanprice 16 Apr 2022 7:25 UTC

  4 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Peter Wildeford’s comment on: Or­ga­ni­za­tions pri­ori­tis­ing neat sig­nals of EA al­ign­ment might sys­tem­at­i­cally miss good can­di­dates

  Hi Peter
  Thank you for your considered comments. When I was completing the applications for your roles I thought the phrasing you used was encouraging to describe one’s individual journey and perspectives regarding EA, and it was much appreciated.

• evanprice 16 Apr 2022 5:09 UTC

  2 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Joseph Lemien’s comment on: Or­ga­ni­za­tions pri­ori­tis­ing neat sig­nals of EA al­ign­ment might sys­tem­at­i­cally miss good can­di­dates

  Thanks for your feedback, indeed I was concerned that I would be perceived as bitter and I hope I mitigated that by explicitly stating the opposite, which is true.
  I’m fortunate to have the time to commit to volunteering and integration into the movement, and if I don’t find a workable place for myself I have a previous career to go back to, so really the intention really just is to inform and discuss.

Or­ga­ni­za­tions pri­ori­tis­ing neat sig­nals of EA al­ign­ment might sys­tem­at­i­cally miss good can­di­dates

• evanprice 28 Nov 2018 12:55 UTC

  3 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: Earn­ing to Save

  Reading this post it dawned on me that this was exactly how my experience had transpired, albeit I was completely unaware that it was happening—I saved up and left my regular developed world existence to ride a bicycle across a fair amount of the world. My experiences on the bike and the time available to think deeply (as you suggest) led me to learning about and becoming very aligned with EA. While I’m still travelling, I’m now in the phase of figuring out how best to prepare myself for future work in an EA related field, and the financial and time freedom is giving me the means to do so.

  All of which is to say that from personal experience this point has proved to be incredibly influential in allowing me to transform my thinking and future plans to be aligned with EA.