I do research in topics that I’m very interested in, as you. And I am also very interested in EA, rationality and so on, as you seem to be. I was wandering if you share a problem I have: I really don’t know where my work starts or ends. I mean, many stuff I do (read, watch, write) for fun could be clearly considered work, and vice versa, many things I do for work could be considered leisure. It does also seem to be the case for you.
Did you consider writing this post as part of your work, for example? Or reading EA posts? Or reading any blog or article about philosophy of mind, AI and so on? I guess you consider the work coordinating the digital minds group as part of your (paid) work, right? Where do you set the boundary. Or better, how do you set the boundary?
I really struggle with that. It is often not very relevant to clearly distinguish what is actual work and what it is not, but other times it is. In addition, it is not strange that something that started as ‘for fun’ ends being part of your research or main working activity (e.g. the digital minds group for you).
I think the weak point of the fable is that they only begin to think about the reorganisation after the dragon is dead; this could lead to worse consequences than the dragon. Thinking about overpopulation, for example, at least they have to know that they have enough environmental buffer to sustain it until the culture drift back into having fewer children later. Otherwise, the whole population could just die of hunger.
Actually, I don’t think this is a weak point of the fable, it actually makes it much more real; that’s how we humans usually behave. What it shows is that we really need to avoid this mistake.