OOO from Dec 23 to Jan 13.
Hello! Iām Toby. Iām Content Manager at CEA. I work with the Online Team to make sure the Forum is a great place to discuss doing the most good we can. Youāll see me posting a lot, authoring the EA Newsletter and curating Forum Digests, making moderator comments and decisions, and more.
Before working at CEA, I studied Philosophy at the University of Warwick, and worked for a couple of years on a range of writing and editing projects within the EA space. Recently I helped run the Amplify Creative Grants program, to encourage more impactful podcasting and YouTube projects. You can find a bit of my own creative output on my blog, and my podcast feed.
From the rest of the comments, it looks as if I misunderstood this line: āThe judges have ruled in favour on our main argumentāthat the law says that animals should not be kept in the UK if it means they will suffer because of how they have been bred. This is a huge moment for animals in the UK.ā I.e., it looks as if it should be rephrased to āsolely because of how they have been bredā, still a good thing, but not the home run I was hoping for.
I really appreciated clarification from @JBentham (this is particularly helpful), and the pushback on the content of the post from @Habryka, @VettedCauses and others!