Weaver

• Weaver 6 Mar 2024 23:18 UTC

  5 points

  1 ∶ 0

  on: What posts are you think­ing about writ­ing?

  About how to run an EA organization with the intent of it being a part time investment of time. 1-2 days per month with a potential 4-12 day stretch once a year. I had this idea when I talked to Ulrik Horne about how he could slowly start up a biosecurity/​bio shelter project.

  I think it’s a good idea for an organization that can pay for 1-4 full timers and then flex once a month to work on projects together. This is what organizations like the Army Reserves does for building a capability/​capacity that is needed but not imminently.

• Weaver 12 Dec 2023 15:13 UTC

  8 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Nathan Young’s comment on: Nathan Young’s Shortform

  Pretend that you’re a Texan vaccine distributor.

  You have the facility to produce en mass, something that once given out will no longer make a profit, so there’s no incentive to make a factory, but you’re an EA true and true so you build the thing you need and make the doses. Now you have doses in a warehouse somewhere.

  You have to take the vaccine all over the admittedly large state, but with a good set of roads and railroads, this is an easily solvable problem, right?

  You have a pile of vaccine, potentially connections with Texan hospitals who thankfully ALL speak English and you have the funding from your company to send people to distribute the vaccine.

  There may or may not be a cold chain needed so you might need refrigerated trucks, but this is a solvable problem right? Cold chain trucks can’t be that more expensive than regular trucks?

  So you go out and you start directing the largest portion of vaccines to go to the large cities and health departments, just to reach your 29 million people that you’re trying to hit. You pay a good salary to your logisticians and drivers to get the vaccines where they need to go.

  In a few days, you’re able to effectively get a large chunk of your doses to where they need to go, but now you run into the problem of last mile logistics, where you need to get a dose to a person.

  That means that the public has to get the message that this is available for them, where they can find it and how they can do it. God forbid there be a party that is trying to PSYOP that your vaccine causes Malarial cancer or something because that would be a problem.

  You’ll have your early adopters, sure but after some time the people that will follow prudent public health measures will drop off and the lines will be empty.

  You’ll still have 14 million doses, which have they been properly stored? This is of course accounting for the number of Texans who just won’t get a vaccine or are perhaps too young.

  So you appeal to the state government to pass a law that all 8th graders need to have this once in a lifetime vaccine and in a miracle, they make it a law. You move the needle a little bit. 7.5 Million Texans are under 18, but those might be the easiest to get as they’re actively interacting with the government at least in the capacity of education.

  And as you might guess, this isn’t about Texas. This is every country.

• Weaver 23 Oct 2023 15:30 UTC

  2 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: Help Needed in Push for a Rapid Malaria Vac­cine Rollout

  I love to see things like this spun up. As African countries are the primary recipient of this kind of vaccine I would expect that (It makes sense to me) we have to think about the big problems.

  Logistics:

  Let’s assume that there are no cultural issues and everyone was able to communicate fairly, right? Now you’re dealing with the tyranny of distance and the last mile problem. Not only that, but you’re dealing with the last mile problem four times and that is just getting the vaccine to where it needs to be. I’m going to go out on a limb here and state that the vaccine cold chain which is common in some vaccines may weigh in.

  In brief: If a vaccine needs to be kept at a certain temperature to administer it, then there had to be a chain of custody that is refrigerated. Now imagine that you have to truck vaccines 1000 km from the capital of Tanzania to the northern reaches.

  Secondarily you have the problem of setting up health clinics where recipients will show up FOUR times. I wish this was already a once and done, but hey if we can eliminate Malaria in my lifetime? I’ll call up several thousand friends.

  Cultural and Language Barriers:

  Assuming you have solved the first problem, then you run into the issue that some people may be avoidant to the vaccine or you need to translate the material into Somali or another smaller language. This is where I’m going to go into recommendations and recommend that we pair this with a messaging campaign on the most used platform in that country. This will be highly specific, but say if Nigeria is mostly on the radio, then a few radio spots about the rollout would go a long way.

  Recommendation:

  There are already aid orgs and EA orgs inside of Africa with good talent that we can reach out to for some on the ground assistance setting this up. LEEP(https://​​leadelimination.org/​​) may already have a network of trusted agents in country that you can lean upon and Family Empowerment Media(https://​​www.familyempowermentmedia.org/​​) does messaging already. I would start by asking those two if they could help start this.

  Additionally it would benefit the local economy to produce the vaccines in Africa, this would also solve some of the cultural issues since it’s made there. This would solve some of the logistical issues with getting the vaccine there, but not all.

• Weaver 11 Oct 2023 15:10 UTC

  1 point

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Cristina Schmidt Ibáñez’s comment on: Oper­a­tions: We only have two (types of) meet­ings now.

  Thanks for this. This comes from a relatively top down (but locally administered) org structure which may not reflect exactly on other organizations.

  We do have a structure that the commanders/​decision makers may not always be present when we discuss things due to them needing to speak to higher echelons or other commitments and this may not reflect outside of a governmental structure.

  I’m adding the handbook to my reading list, though and hope to update this when I do. (Rough that it costs so much though!)

Oper­a­tions: We only have two (types of) meet­ings now.

• Weaver 25 Sep 2023 13:47 UTC

  12 points

  2 ∶ 0

  on: Is any­one look­ing into geno­cide in Su­dan?

  I have a professional background in this and even that is telling me that this is a wait and see thing. However what we can do is look at what aid agencies are doing.

  This is not a neglected area generally. Agencies like catholic charities, UN World Food Program(WFP) and other similar ones can and will set up Internally displaced person camps(IDP) - (camps in country)- or Refugee camps - (outside of country).

  In this area, the African Union is strong and they would be the lead element of any type of foreign aid, perhaps with coalition partners like America, Italy, Germany, Japan, etc.

  But let’s back this up. Let’s say that you’re a resident of Darfur. Your country borders Chad, the CAR and South Sudan. You have a spouse and children and the means to leave(a car? a plane ticket?) Where would you go? Perhaps to Ethiopia? Drive through Chad to Nigeria? What are you willing to risk to do it? Will you walk hundreds of miles to get to a camp that you’re not sure will be there?

  What would you need? Water, food, shelter, etc. Camps would get that.

  Now what could you individually do? You could donate money to an organization or sponsor the Visa of a Sudanese refugee.

  If you knew someone who had a plane/​pilot service you could arrange a flight to pick up refugees and move them out of country. Someone I work with did this to get his translators and their families out of Afghanistan.

  If you had logistical skills? You could go work for WFP or one of the aid agencies.

  Can you drive/​maintain a bus? You can figure out a way to help out with this.

  Do you speak arabic? The camps will need translators. Do you speak arabic, english and another language? Even better.

  I love the idea of creative interventions. I do. There are aid agencies on the ground with experienced people to do this the way they have been doing it for a while.

  If I was looking or a creative intervention that would get me shot, I’d buy a plot of land in Ethiopia or Chad and setup a refugee camp, with aid stations leading to it. That’s a lot of money though and that’s a short term plan.

  I would start by asking agencies working in the area them what their pain points are. They might have trouble with funding, staffing, etc. That would direct my next steps.

• Weaver 25 Sep 2023 13:20 UTC

  3 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: Great books about char­ity, aid and de­vel­op­ment?

  Toxic Charity and Dead aid(though both have problems)

• Weaver 14 Sep 2023 19:57 UTC

  1 point

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Chris Leong’s comment on: About my job: “Plans Officer”

  Yes, since the other half of what I do is operations. My understanding at least from the requests from the High Performance Network is that this is an in demand skillset.

  I’ve also spoken to a few people on interview about how to effectively work in Africa, or at the very least how to get to a place where you can do a trial project. I wouldn’t be in EA if I didn’t want to help people, I just wish we were a bit more effective at it as a government.

  For instance: there’s been times when Teams I’ve trained have the skills but not the funding to do something that the host nation needs, whereas the Italian Civil Affairs or CIMIC team had the funding so we just asked them if they wanted it.

• Weaver 10 Sep 2023 14:48 UTC

  5 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: Writ­ing about your job is (still) great — con­sider do­ing it

  I debated for a minute if I should do this and just did it. Thanks to Lizka, because I just copied her format.

About my job: “Plans Officer”

• Weaver 9 Aug 2023 17:25 UTC

  1 point

  0 ∶ 0

  on: How can we im­prove In­fo­haz­ard Gover­nance in EA Biose­cu­rity?

  You know what would be a great way to teach this. Just make up an info hazard type event. Tabletop war game it. Say the thing is called a mome rath and it’s anti-memetic or something(Go read worth the candle). Have the experts explain how they would treat the problem, and use that as a guide for how to interact with info hazards.

  Maybe I am focused on the government piece of this but there’s probably damaging information that would hurt national security if it got out. That’s why we have classification systems in place. If we can’t even have the experts talk about it, then we need to really think about why that is and give them a softball to explain it. (Then think about why they’re thinking this, etc.)

  Look, there is a risk. We just need to be able to explain it so that people don’t go looking at the door of forbidden knowledge thinking, “I really need to know everything in there.” When really what is behind the door is just a bunch of formulas that the current batch of 3d printers know not to make.

  Counterpoint: make it boring and now one will be interested. Instead if Rokos Basilisk, think of calling it IRS-CP Form 23A.

• Weaver 26 Jul 2023 19:27 UTC

  3 points

  1 ∶ 0

  on: Weaver’s Quick takes

  I think that the short hand of “this person vouches for this other person” is a good enough basis for a lot of pre-screening criteria. Not that it makes the person a shoe in for the job, but it’s enough to say that you can go by on a referral.

  You might say, this is a strange way to pick people, but this is how governments interview people for national security roles. They check references. They ask questions.

  I imagine more questions would be asked to the third party who is ‘personally referring’ the applicant, leading to a slightly different series of interviews anyway. In my experience, people have to work a lot harder to get a job, than to keep one. I know that it’s true with everyone that referred me to just about every position. Then if I perform badly it looks poorly on them, but after a certain time, I’m the one referring people onwards, so I have to make my own assessment of if I’m willing to put my reputation on the line.

Weaver’s Quick takes

• Weaver 26 Jul 2023 19:25 UTC

  8 points

  5 ∶ 1

  in reply to: Siao Si’s comment on: Siao Si’s Quick takes

  I think that the short hand of “this person vouches for this other person” is a good enough basis for a lot of pre-screening criteria. Not that it makes the person a shoe in for the job, but it’s enough to say that you can go by on a referral.

  You might say, this is a strange way to pick people, but this is how governments interview people for national security roles. They check references. They ask questions.

  I imagine more questions would be asked to the third party who is ‘personally referring’ the applicant, leading to a slightly different series of interviews anyway. In my experience, people have to work a lot harder to get a job, than to keep one. I know that it’s true with everyone that referred me to just about every position. Then if I perform badly it looks poorly on them, but after a certain time, I’m the one referring people onwards, so I have to make my own assessment of if I’m willing to put my reputation on the line.

• Weaver 4 Jul 2023 21:57 UTC

  1 point

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: karl hedderich’s comment on: Open Thread: July—Septem­ber 2023

  I feel like this is an excessively software driven way to do this. I have a suggestion.

  Make it a hardware thing.

  AI relies on circuitboards and memory and connections etc, so instead of making it something that can be found out using an algorithm, make it a physical key that does a physical thing.

  Think of a lock on an obscure door versus a really really good password.

  You can brute force any password, given time. Physical access is access.

  If you can’t even find the widget? Yeah.

  The opposite is also important. If the Killswitch needs to be integrated then removed it should be a “this needs to be done once every two years but the rest of the time it’s hidden via obscurity”.

  Also development of AGI, just making it would be difficult so hastening it for no reason? Hmmm.

• Weaver 28 Jun 2023 13:36 UTC

  5 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Shakeel Hashim’s comment on: An­nounc­ing CE’s new Re­search Train­ing Pro­gram—Ap­ply Now!

  This is exactly my thought right here. I would like to go through the materials but full time is too rapid for me currently.

• Weaver 22 Jun 2023 18:38 UTC

  1 point

  0 ∶ 0

  on: Is there a cen­tral place for EA orgs to share les­sons learned about op­er­a­tions?

  Something like an EA Center for Lessons Learned? Sounds like a great idea (now how to get funding for it?).

• Weaver 17 May 2023 15:44 UTC

  2 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: 🎲 In­tro­duc­ing The Long Game Pro­ject: Table­top Ex­er­cises for a Re­silient Tomorrow

  This is quite similar to what I’m looking to do, definitely more fresh. Heading to discord to make friends.

• Weaver 16 May 2023 18:07 UTC

  2 points

  1 ∶ 1

  in reply to: Kyle Smith’s comment on: Choos­ing a job for an un­fit and stupid man

  Honestly, I know many people that aren’t smart but still are dedicated and get things done. I would take a dedicated person who can make things happen over someone who sounds great on paper but isn’t the best at getting people to understand what they mean.

  On the more pressing idea, I think that you should look into becoming a junior operations manager: https://​​80000hours.org/​​articles/​​operations-management/​​ Operations touches all aspects of EA and if you can make someone work more efficiently, then you’re on the right path. This would hopefully give you more exposure to other career paths.

  Also don’t discount the ability to speak Polish, English, and French. Just having that skillset will help you out a ton. I don’t know what the EA community is like in Poland or France, but I’m sure there is someone.

• Weaver 16 May 2023 17:59 UTC

  2 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: VictoriaS’s comment on: What are work prac­tices that you’ve adopted that you now think are un­der­rated?

  For me full-time work(military) there are certain safety regulations regarding when things need to happen and who needs to sign off on them so they can go ahead. A recent example is when we had an emerging requirement that needed a general to sign off on something otherwise six months of planning for an event would be out the window. The general was out of our chain of command and thus wouldn’t need us to do the thing we needed, it would just be good training for his people. We had a requirement, they had a requirement and something got lost in the translation, causing us to either make several high-level phone calls or drop the glass ball.