For posts about what the EA community is like, as opposed to the core ideas of EA themselves. Currently, these posts get filed under Criticism of effective altruism even though it doesnāt quite fit.
If we have three criticism tags covering ācausesā, āorganizationsā, and ācommunityā, then having a general ācriticism of EAā tag doesnāt seem to make sense. The best alternative seems like ācriticism of EA philosophyā.
If I donāt hear objections from Pablo/āMichael, Iāll make that change in a week or so and re-tag relevant posts.
So the plan is to have 4 tags, covering community, causes, organizations, and philosophy? Is so, that sounds good to me, I think.
If the idea was to have just three (without philosophy), Iād have said it feels like thereās something missing, e.g. for criticism of the ITN framework or ~impartial welfarism or the way EA uses expected value reasoning or whatever.
Criticism of the EA community
For posts about what the EA community is like, as opposed to the core ideas of EA themselves. Currently, these posts get filed under Criticism of effective altruism even though it doesnāt quite fit.
Seems like a good idea!
If we have three criticism tags covering ācausesā, āorganizationsā, and ācommunityā, then having a general ācriticism of EAā tag doesnāt seem to make sense. The best alternative seems like ācriticism of EA philosophyā.
If I donāt hear objections from Pablo/āMichael, Iāll make that change in a week or so and re-tag relevant posts.
So the plan is to have 4 tags, covering community, causes, organizations, and philosophy? Is so, that sounds good to me, I think.
If the idea was to have just three (without philosophy), Iād have said it feels like thereās something missing, e.g. for criticism of the ITN framework or ~impartial welfarism or the way EA uses expected value reasoning or whatever.
Update: I have created Criticism of the effective altruism community.