If we have three criticism tags covering âcausesâ, âorganizationsâ, and âcommunityâ, then having a general âcriticism of EAâ tag doesnât seem to make sense. The best alternative seems like âcriticism of EA philosophyâ.
If I donât hear objections from Pablo/âMichael, Iâll make that change in a week or so and re-tag relevant posts.
So the plan is to have 4 tags, covering community, causes, organizations, and philosophy? Is so, that sounds good to me, I think.
If the idea was to have just three (without philosophy), Iâd have said it feels like thereâs something missing, e.g. for criticism of the ITN framework or ~impartial welfarism or the way EA uses expected value reasoning or whatever.
Seems like a good idea!
If we have three criticism tags covering âcausesâ, âorganizationsâ, and âcommunityâ, then having a general âcriticism of EAâ tag doesnât seem to make sense. The best alternative seems like âcriticism of EA philosophyâ.
If I donât hear objections from Pablo/âMichael, Iâll make that change in a week or so and re-tag relevant posts.
So the plan is to have 4 tags, covering community, causes, organizations, and philosophy? Is so, that sounds good to me, I think.
If the idea was to have just three (without philosophy), Iâd have said it feels like thereâs something missing, e.g. for criticism of the ITN framework or ~impartial welfarism or the way EA uses expected value reasoning or whatever.