RSS

Asymmetry

TagLast edit: 4 Oct 2023 12:03 UTC by Amber Dawn

The Asymmetry refers to the view in population ethics that, while we ought to avoid creating additional bad lives, there is no requirement to create additional good ones. That is, there is an asymmetry between intuitions that (i) creating bad lives is bad but (ii) creating good lives is not good.


Related entries

population ethics | utilitarianism

Paper sum­mary: Do not go gen­tle: why the Asym­me­try does not sup­port anti-na­tal­ism (An­dreas Mo­gensen)

Global Priorities Institute20 Dec 2022 11:00 UTC
21 points
2 comments5 min readEA link

Min­i­mal­ist ax­iolo­gies and pos­i­tive lives

Teo Ajantaival13 Nov 2021 10:57 UTC
54 points
12 comments25 min readEA link

A cri­tique of strong longtermism

Pablo Rosado28 Aug 2022 19:33 UTC
11 points
11 comments14 min readEA link

Con­fused about “mak­ing peo­ple happy” vs. “mak­ing happy peo­ple”

tobiasleenaert16 Jul 2022 15:07 UTC
67 points
47 comments1 min readEA link

Con­di­tional in­ter­ests, asym­me­tries and EA priorities

MichaelStJules21 Oct 2019 6:13 UTC
22 points
23 comments14 min readEA link

Pop­u­la­tion Ethics Without Ax­iol­ogy: A Framework

Lukas_Gloor2 Aug 2022 15:59 UTC
79 points
16 comments26 min readEA link

Teruji Thomas, ‘The Asym­me­try, Uncer­tainty, and the Long Term’

Pablo5 Nov 2019 20:24 UTC
43 points
6 comments1 min readEA link
(globalprioritiesinstitute.org)

Cri­tique of MacAskill’s “Is It Good to Make Happy Peo­ple?”

Magnus Vinding23 Aug 2022 9:21 UTC
219 points
115 comments8 min readEA link

Linkpost for var­i­ous re­cent es­says on suffer­ing-fo­cused ethics, pri­ori­ties, and more

Magnus Vinding28 Sep 2022 8:58 UTC
87 points
0 comments5 min readEA link
(centerforreducingsuffering.org)

Defend­ing the Pro­cre­ation Asym­me­try with Con­di­tional Interests

MichaelStJules13 Oct 2019 18:49 UTC
34 points
13 comments8 min readEA link

Suffer­ing-Fo­cused Ethics (SFE) FAQ

EdisonY16 Oct 2021 11:33 UTC
77 points
22 comments25 min readEA link

The asym­me­try and the far future

John G. Halstead9 Mar 2017 22:05 UTC
11 points
14 comments6 min readEA link

Do not go gen­tle: why the Asym­me­try does not sup­port anti-natalism

Global Priorities Institute30 Apr 2021 13:26 UTC
4 points
0 comments2 min readEA link

Crit­i­cal sum­mary of Meacham’s “Per­son-Affect­ing Views and Sat­u­rat­ing Coun­ter­part Re­la­tions”

Arden Koehler5 Jan 2021 2:18 UTC
55 points
30 comments11 min readEA link

A longter­mist cri­tique of “The ex­pected value of ex­tinc­tion risk re­duc­tion is pos­i­tive”

Anthony DiGiovanni1 Jul 2021 21:01 UTC
125 points
10 comments32 min readEA link

some con­cerns with clas­si­cal utilitarianism

nil14 Nov 2020 9:29 UTC
31 points
17 comments19 min readEA link

Against Con­di­tional Beneficence

Richard Y Chappell9 Nov 2023 16:55 UTC
13 points
0 comments7 min readEA link
(rychappell.substack.com)

The asym­me­try, un­cer­tainty, and the long term

Global Priorities Institute30 Sep 2019 13:37 UTC
13 points
0 comments4 min readEA link
(globalprioritiesinstitute.org)

Com­plex­ity of value but not dis­value im­plies more fo­cus on s-risk. Mo­ral un­cer­tainty and prefer­ence util­i­tar­i­anism also do.

Chi13 Feb 2024 22:24 UTC
95 points
7 comments2 min readEA link
No comments.