RSS

Consequentialism

TagLast edit: 31 Mar 2023 14:38 UTC by Pablo

Consequentialism is the normative theory according to which the rightness of an act is determined solely by the goodness of its consequences.

Combining consequentialism with welfarism—the view that well-being is the only source of value—yields utilitarianism, the theory that an act is morally right if and only if it maximizes well-being. When utilitarianism is further combined with hedonism as an account of well-being, the result is hedonistic utilitarianism—an influential theory held by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, and Henry Sidgwick. On this theory, an act is morally right if and only if it maximizes the surplus of happiness over suffering. If, instead, utilitarianism is combined with a desire-fulfillment account of well-being, the result is preference utilitarianism, which holds that an act is morally right if and only if it maximizes preference satisfaction.

Consequentialism may instead be combined with a non-welfarist axiology. One such theory is pluralistic consequentialism, which holds that an act is morally right if and only if it maximizes the overall degree to which various different values—including both well-being and non well-being sources of value—are realized.

Another important difference between consequentialist views is whether the nature of the beneficiary influences how we weigh the good. Classical utilitarians, for example, would argue that one unit of pleasure is equally good no matter who experiences it, while prioritarians argue that it would be better if that unit of pleasure was experienced by someone who is relatively worse off.

Further reading

MacAskill, William & Darius Meissner (2020) ‘Consequentialism’, in Elements and types of utilitarianism, utilitarianism.

Sebo, Jeff & Tyler John (2020) Consequentialism and nonhuman animals, in Douglas W. Portmore (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Consequentialism, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 563–591.

Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (2003) Consequentialism, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, May 20 (updated 3 June 2019).

Related entries

Derek Parfit | normative ethics | utilitarianism | welfarism

‘Con­se­quen­tial­ism’ is be­ing used to mean sev­eral differ­ent things

Theo Hawking11 Jun 2022 15:43 UTC
33 points
10 comments6 min readEA link

In­tegrity for consequentialists

Paul_Christiano14 Nov 2016 20:56 UTC
177 points
18 comments8 min readEA link

Deon­tic Fictionalism

Richard Y Chappell🔸17 Feb 2023 13:44 UTC
37 points
7 comments4 min readEA link
(rychappell.substack.com)

Pos­i­tive roles of life and ex­pe­rience in suffer­ing-fo­cused ethics

Teo Ajantaival22 May 2021 16:05 UTC
49 points
1 comment19 min readEA link

Cain Killed Abel: A Heuris­tic Guide to the Three Ma­jor Schools of Ethics in the Western Tradition

Mahendra Prasad20 Aug 2021 1:06 UTC
15 points
0 comments3 min readEA link

Deon­tol­ogy and virtue ethics as “effec­tive the­o­ries” of con­se­quen­tial­ist ethics

Jan_Kulveit17 Nov 2022 9:20 UTC
55 points
12 comments10 min readEA link

Peace­ful­ness, non­vi­o­lence, and ex­pe­ri­en­tial­ist minimalism

Teo Ajantaival23 May 2022 19:17 UTC
62 points
14 comments29 min readEA link

Effec­tive Altru­ism and Utilitarianism

Tom_Ash30 Jan 2015 11:18 UTC
8 points
54 comments5 min readEA link

Con­se­quen­tial­ists (in so­ciety) should self-mod­ify to have side con­straints

Jack R3 Aug 2022 22:47 UTC
71 points
12 comments3 min readEA link

Min­i­mal­ist ax­iolo­gies and pos­i­tive lives

Teo Ajantaival13 Nov 2021 10:57 UTC
57 points
12 comments24 min readEA link

The Alie­na­tion Ob­jec­tion to Consequentialism

Calvin_Baker4 May 2020 20:05 UTC
36 points
15 comments13 min readEA link

Mo­gensen & MacAskill, ‘The paral­y­sis ar­gu­ment’

Pablo19 Jul 2021 14:04 UTC
15 points
2 comments1 min readEA link
(quod.lib.umich.edu)

Con­se­quen­tial­ism and Cluelessness

Richard Y Chappell🔸17 Oct 2022 18:57 UTC
30 points
5 comments9 min readEA link
(rychappell.substack.com)

Rea­sons and Per­sons: Watch the­o­ries eat themselves

Aaron Gertler 🔸25 Dec 2021 3:53 UTC
64 points
7 comments15 min readEA link
(dynomight.net)

Launch­ing Utili­tar­i­anism.net: An In­tro­duc­tory On­line Text­book on Utilitarianism

DM9 Mar 2020 17:13 UTC
73 points
27 comments7 min readEA link

Ques­tion­ing Benefi­cence: Four Philoso­phers on Effec­tive Altru­ism and Do­ing Good

Richard Y Chappell🔸28 Sep 2024 15:45 UTC
35 points
0 comments2 min readEA link
(www.goodthoughts.blog)

Ag­gre­gat­ing Small Risks of Se­ri­ous Harms (Tomi Fran­cis)

Global Priorities Institute23 Oct 2024 10:58 UTC
14 points
0 comments5 min readEA link
(globalprioritiesinstitute.org)

LW4EA: Philo­soph­i­cal Landmines

Jeremy26 Apr 2022 2:53 UTC
9 points
1 comment1 min readEA link
(www.lesswrong.com)

[Linkpost] Leif We­nar’s The Deaths of Effec­tive Altruism

Earthling27 Mar 2024 15:35 UTC
46 points
58 comments1 min readEA link
(www.wired.com)

Should we Max­i­mize the Geo­met­ric Ex­pec­ta­tion?

A.H.19 Apr 2024 20:06 UTC
12 points
6 comments9 min readEA link

The Lo­cal­ity Prob­lem: how to bal­ance the need and dan­gers of sub­jec­tivity and its refusal

Markus Bredberg15 Feb 2023 2:19 UTC
2 points
4 comments15 min readEA link

MORE Effec­tive Altruism

Marty Nemko19 Dec 2022 23:19 UTC
1 point
4 comments1 min readEA link

Un­der heaven’s eyes: For the dig­nity of consequentialism

Philosophy Bear6 Mar 2023 23:00 UTC
30 points
1 comment12 min readEA link
(substack.com)

Dist­in­guish­ing Between Eth­i­cal and De­ci­sion Consequentialism

Siya Sawhney8 Jul 2024 13:43 UTC
7 points
0 comments1 min readEA link
(forum.effectivealtruism.org)

Ar­gu­ing for util­i­tar­i­anism

Omnizoid14 Dec 2021 19:31 UTC
3 points
2 comments64 min readEA link

The Ul­ti­mate Ar­gu­ment Against Deon­tol­ogy And For Utilitarianism

Omnizoid29 Jul 2023 9:36 UTC
15 points
9 comments8 min readEA link

Maybe Utili­tar­i­anism Is More Use­fully A The­ory For De­cid­ing Between Other Eth­i­cal Theories

Jordan Arel17 Nov 2022 17:31 UTC
6 points
3 comments2 min readEA link

[Link post] Sam Scheffler: Con­ser­vatism, Tem­po­ral Bias, and Fu­ture Generations

peterhartree19 Sep 2021 8:44 UTC
44 points
3 comments24 min readEA link

In Defence of Tem­po­ral Dis­count­ing in Longter­mist Ethics

𝕮𝖎𝖓𝖊𝖗𝖆13 Nov 2022 21:30 UTC
17 points
5 comments3 min readEA link

Be­ing nicer than Clippy

Joe_Carlsmith16 Jan 2024 19:44 UTC
25 points
3 comments1 min readEA link

SBF’s com­ments on ethics are no sur­prise to virtue ethicists

c.trout1 Dec 2022 4:21 UTC
10 points
31 comments16 min readEA link
(www.lesswrong.com)

New Book: “Min­i­mal­ist Ax­iolo­gies: Alter­na­tives to ‘Good Minus Bad’ Views of Value”

Teo Ajantaival19 Jul 2024 13:00 UTC
60 points
8 comments5 min readEA link

Mo­ral Cat­e­gories and Consequentialism

Peter Porcino15 Sep 2022 17:37 UTC
3 points
2 comments2 min readEA link

[Question] How to ap­proach the dilemma be­tween the law of un­in­tended con­se­quences and the con­se­quences of non­ac­tion?

kristin.h20 Jun 2022 2:20 UTC
2 points
1 comment1 min readEA link

Va­ri­eties of min­i­mal­ist moral views: Against ab­surd acts

Teo Ajantaival7 Nov 2023 11:57 UTC
50 points
3 comments10 min readEA link

Deon­tol­ogy is not the solution

Peter McLaughlin16 Nov 2022 14:22 UTC
38 points
1 comment4 min readEA link

Paper sum­mary: The paral­y­sis ar­gu­ment (William MacAskill and An­dreas Mo­gensen)

Global Priorities Institute16 Dec 2022 16:12 UTC
18 points
3 comments5 min readEA link
(globalprioritiesinstitute.org)
No comments.