RSS

Consequentialism

TagLast edit: 22 May 2021 16:46 UTC by EA Wiki assistant

Consequentialism is the normative theory according to which the rightness of an act is determined solely by the goodness of its consequences.

Combining consequentialism with welfarism—the view that well-being is the only source of value—yields utilitarianism, the theory that the morally right act is the one that maximizes well-being. When utilitarianism is further combined with hedonism as an account of well-being, the result is hedonistic, or classical, utilitarianism—an influential theory held by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, and Henry Sidgwick, according to which the morally right act is that which maximizes the surplus of happiness over suffering. If instead utilitarianism is combined with a desire-fulfilment account of well-being, the result is preference utilitarianism, which holds that the morally right act is that which maximizes preference satisfaction.

Consequentialism may instead be combined with a non-welfarist axiology. One such theory is pluralistic consequentialism, on which the right act is that which maximizes the overall degree to which various different values—including both well-being and non well-being sources of value—are realized.

Another important difference between consequentialist views is whether the nature of the beneficiary influences how we weight the good. Classical utilitarians, for example, would argue that one unit of pleasure is equally good no matter who experiences it, while prioritarians argue that it would be better if that unit of pleasure was experienced by someone who is relatively worse off.

Bibliography

MacAskill, William & Darius Meissner (2020) ‘Consequentialism’, in Elements and types of utilitarianism, Utilitarianism.

Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (2003) Consequentialism, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, May 20 (updated 3 June 2019).

Related entries

Derek Parfit | normative ethics | utilitarianism | welfarism

Cain Killed Abel: A Heuris­tic Guide to the Three Ma­jor Schools of Ethics in the Western Tradition

Mahendra Prasad20 Aug 2021 1:06 UTC
12 points
0 comments3 min readEA link

In­tegrity for consequentialists

Paul_Christiano14 Nov 2016 20:56 UTC
50 points
15 commentsEA link

The Alie­na­tion Ob­jec­tion to Consequentialism

Calvin_Baker4 May 2020 20:05 UTC
35 points
15 comments13 min readEA link

Launch­ing Utili­tar­i­anism.net: An In­tro­duc­tory On­line Text­book on Utilitarianism

Darius_M9 Mar 2020 17:13 UTC
82 points
27 comments7 min readEA link

Effec­tive Altru­ism and Utilitarianism

Tom_Ash30 Jan 2015 11:18 UTC
8 points
56 commentsEA link

Pos­i­tive roles of life and ex­pe­rience in suffer­ing-fo­cused ethics

Teo Ajantaival22 May 2021 16:05 UTC
43 points
1 comment24 min readEA link

Mo­gensen & MacAskill, ‘The paral­y­sis ar­gu­ment’

Pablo19 Jul 2021 14:04 UTC
14 points
1 comment1 min readEA link
(quod.lib.umich.edu)

[Link post] Sam Scheffler: Con­ser­vatism, Tem­po­ral Bias, and Fu­ture Generations

peterhartree19 Sep 2021 8:44 UTC
44 points
3 comments24 min readEA link
No comments.