RSS

In­finite ethics

TagLast edit: May 25, 2022, 10:17 AM by Leo

Infinite ethics is the branch of moral philosophy that studies the ethical implications of living in an infinite universe.

The possibility that the universe is infinite, and that it might therefore contain an infinite number of morally relevant beings, is a challenge to moral theories that instruct us to increase the good in the world. Briefly, the trouble is that in an infinite universe the amount of good may be infinite no matter what we do, and it is difficult to compare infinities.

Cosmologists commonly regard the universe as infinite in their models. However, this is partly for mathematical simplicity, and there is also an alternative hypothesis: It is possible that the universe “curls in on itself,” in the same way that the two-dimensional surface of the Earth does, such that traveling far enough in any one direction would ultimately bring you back to where you started.

The present situation, roughly, is that an infinite universe would be consistent with all of the data that cosmologists currently have available to them, but it is very difficult to discern the difference between a space that is infinite and a space that is simply enormously big. There is no widely accepted probability that one or the other hypothesis is true.

It is also important to note that a universe could be infinite without also containing infinite value. For instance, an infinite universe which contained only a finite number of life-harboring regions would not pose a problem to aggregative moral theories. However, cosmological evidence points strongly toward the universe also being “uniform,” which means that all sufficiently large-scale regions should have approximately the same properties, including the ability to harbor life.

Further reading

Arntzenius, Frank (2014) Utilitarianism, decision theory and eternity, Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 28, pp. 31–58.

Askell, Amanda (2018) Pareto Principles in Infinite Ethics, PhD thesis, New York University.

Bostrom, Nick (2016) Infinite ethics, Analysis and Metaphysics, vol. 10, pp. 9–59.
An in-depth discussion of the potential moral implications of an infinite universe.

Center on Long-Term Risk (2020) Infinity in ethics, Center on Long-Term Risk.

Tomasik, Brian (2014) Should we believe in infinity?, Essays on Reducing Suffering, December 15 (updated 26 October 2018).

Treutlein, Johannes (2018) A wager against Solomonoff induction, The Universe From an Intentional Stance, March 31.

West, Ben (2015) Problems and solutions in infinite ethics, Effective Altruism Forum, January 1.

Wiblin, Robert & Keiran Harris (2018) Tackling the ethics of infinity, being clueless about the effects of our actions, and having moral empathy for intellectual adversaries, with philosopher Dr Amanda Askell, 80,000 Hours, September 11.

Related entries

axiology | moral philosophy

On in­finite ethics

Joe_CarlsmithJan 31, 2022, 7:17 AM
94 points
29 comments51 min readEA link

Why I am happy to re­ject the pos­si­bil­ity of in­finite worlds

Vasco Grilo🔸Dec 25, 2022, 7:51 PM
13 points
42 comments3 min readEA link

EA read­ing list: pop­u­la­tion ethics, in­finite ethics, an­thropic ethics

richard_ngoAug 3, 2020, 9:22 AM
25 points
10 comments1 min readEA link

[3-hour pod­cast] Michael Hue­mer on episte­mol­ogy, metaethics, EA, util­i­tar­i­anism and in­finite ethics

Gus DockerMar 27, 2021, 9:04 AM
30 points
2 comments1 min readEA link

[Question] What rea­son is there NOT to ac­cept Pas­cal’s Wager?

Transient AltruistAug 4, 2022, 2:29 PM
31 points
82 comments1 min readEA link

Prob­lems and Solu­tions in In­finite Ethics

Ben_West🔸Jan 1, 2015, 8:47 PM
14 points
74 comments5 min readEA link

A Ten­ta­tive Solu­tion To In­finite Ethics

OmnizoidMar 15, 2022, 6:25 PM
6 points
0 comments2 min readEA link

Ev­i­den­tial Co­op­er­a­tion in Large Wor­lds: Po­ten­tial Ob­jec­tions & FAQ

ChiFeb 28, 2024, 6:58 PM
40 points
5 comments18 min readEA link

In­ter­gen­er­a­tional equity and in­finite-pop­u­la­tion ethics: a sur­vey by Mar­cus Pi­vato and Marc Fleurbaey

Jobst Heitzig (vodle.it)Mar 14, 2024, 1:02 PM
7 points
0 comments1 min readEA link
(papers.ssrn.com)

Re­duc­ing the neart­erm risk of hu­man ex­tinc­tion is not as­tro­nom­i­cally cost-effec­tive?

Vasco Grilo🔸Jun 9, 2024, 8:02 AM
20 points
37 comments8 min readEA link

A Stranger Pri­or­ity? Topics at the Outer Reaches of Effec­tive Altru­ism (my dis­ser­ta­tion)

Joe_CarlsmithFeb 21, 2023, 5:16 PM
64 points
0 comments1 min readEA link

Hay­den Wilk­in­son: Do­ing good in an in­finite, chaotic world

EA GlobalFeb 18, 2020, 11:29 PM
34 points
1 comment18 min readEA link
(www.youtube.com)

Sur­vey: do you think in­finite ethics is a se­ri­ous prob­lem?

HmashAug 9, 2022, 10:09 PM
8 points
9 comments1 min readEA link

Some solu­tions to in­finite ethics

OmnizoidAug 16, 2023, 2:42 AM
11 points
0 comments23 min readEA link

New Global Pri­ori­ties In­sti­tute work­ing pa­pers—and an up­dated ver­sion of “The case for strong longter­mism”

Global Priorities InstituteAug 9, 2021, 4:57 PM
46 points
0 comments2 min readEA link

Does “Ul­ti­mate Neart­er­mism” via Eter­nal In­fla­tion dom­i­nate Longter­mism in ex­pec­ta­tion?

Jordan ArelAug 17, 2024, 10:09 PM
15 points
12 comments4 min readEA link

In­finite Ethics—Sketch Part 1: Ex­plo­ra­tions with Sur­re­als

Chris LeongJan 9, 2023, 12:44 AM
9 points
5 comments4 min readEA link

What is so wrong with the “dog­matic” solu­tion to reck­less­ness?

tobycrisford 🔸Feb 11, 2023, 6:29 PM
25 points
31 comments7 min readEA link