Leading Australiaâs key place to engaged with effective giving and the effective altruism community in Australia.
GraceAdamsđ¸
Karma: 2,901
I just watched it and have a lot of tears after the beautiful heart-felt ending! I have family whoâve also worked in slaughterhouses and animal farming, and I think you brought this together in a way that feels compassionate. I think itâs a really well done film! Congratulations!
Thanks so much, Leonie! I totally agree!
Congratulations, Jack! Iâm looking forward to watching it!
Thanks Jacob! Give this a go: https://ââanchor.fm/ââs/ââ11209b150/ââpodcast/âârss
Thanks so much Paula!
Thanks so much! Spotify linked above and weâre looking into broader distribution!
Weâve funded it from our general budget! Letâs catch up at EAG London (if youâre going) and we can chat more!
EffecÂtive AltruÂism AusÂtralia is launchÂing a new podÂcastâdeÂsigned for a broad audience
The Data Is In: âEffecÂtiveâ PhilanÂthropy Has an EvÂiÂdence Issue
Thanks for writing this Lincoln! I see love as the foundation for all my interest in altruism, and have been thinking more about how to incorporate more of the messaging of love in my communications about effective altruism (as well as living up to my value of love as much as I can in other domains).
Iâve been really enjoying All About Love by bell hooksâwho talks similarly about love as the key for social progress. I hope to write more on my reflections about love and effective altruism soon.
You shouldnât have had to go through any of this. I deeply value you sharing your experience and reflections, recognising the personal toll it can take, on a number of fronts.
I am angry at CEA, their response (and lack of) feels unbelievably bad.
As a woman who leads an EA organisation, I have a lot of thoughts and feelings that I cannot properly express at the moment.
You deserved better, women in this movement deserve better.
This is a great call out! It was featured in a longer report that we shared directly with other effective giving orgs, but wasnât called out explicitly as a single post.
Iâll share this again with the effective giving orgs :)
3 reÂcent posts from EffecÂtive AltruÂism AusÂtralia about our work and strategy
Thanks for writing this!
At EA Australia (Australiaâs effective giving fundraising and community building org), our recent impact evaluation found that in 2025 for every $1 spent on operations, we counterfactually moved $9 to effective charities ($5 was a conservative estimate).
You can read more about this in our blog post, which links the google sheet calculations and detailed reasoning for our model. Itâs been based on GWWCâs impact evaluation toolkit.
At the moment, my belief is that we are quite constrained by funding, and would be growing much faster with more resourcing over the next few years. Happy to talk with larger potential donors on this if anyone is interested and will be publishing a summary of our 2026 strategy on our website soon.
One of the reasons to have community members contribute to funding our operations, is the stability that having many smaller donors over few major funders. This makes us much less vulnerable to a major donor shifting direction in future.
We would love to be able to support more of our operations and growth from smaller donors and a variety of sources, and additional funding now would be spent on increasing our staff capacity (currently 4.5 FTE across effective giving and community building) to enable further growth!
In case Iâve convinced anyone, our donate form is here.
Rowan, this is enormously sweet! I just logged in to the EA Forum for the first time in ages and Iâm really honoured! Being public about my health has felt like a tough decision but knowing that itâs resonated with you and others makes it feel really worth it!
Iâm so thrilled that weâve achieved this milestone- and I canât wait to see what we can achieve in the future <3
Hi Habeeb,
I work at GWWC as the Head of Marketing :)
Thank you for your generosity and for sharing your perspective! We are actively interested in how we can help cultivate people giving effectively from all over the world, so this is really helpful feedback for us!
Iâve asked someone on the team who knows why we have the $5 minimum to follow up in the comments here, so stay tuned for their response. My guess is that with the processing fees associated, it might not make sense for us to support donations less than $5 - but this post will help us challenge those assumptions!
On why we donât have a bigger range of charities to donate to: We have a pretty strict process in terms of the charities we allow on our platform, which you can read more about in our inclusion criteria if youâre interested. Basically, we want to make sure that donors have options that are sufficiently high-impact, and that the charities get sufficient value from being on our platform.
Some suggestions on donating smaller amounts:
If there is a trusted person in the group, you could pool all your money together to be able to reach the threshold of $5, and maybe you could make a collaborative decision on where to donateâthis could even be a nice way to help talk about giving and your thought process with friends.
Wait until you are able to donate the minimum $5, and set aside this money in the meantime.
Against Malaria Foundation allows donations as low as $2 USD: https://ââwww.againstmalaria.com/ââDonation.aspx
I also liked the suggestions from others in the comments. I think thereâs lots of ways to donate and they donât all necessarily go through GWWC!
I appreciate your perspective on wanting to cultivate the habit of donating small amounts but also generally caution that especially for students, that youâre making sure you have enough for your own expenses and emergencies first. Making sure that the habit is sustainable is an important factor for long term giving!
Thanks again for sharing this, Habeeb and Iâll make sure someone else follows up about the $5 limit!
Hi satelliteprocess! Iâm Grace, the Head of Marketing at GWWC.
While you can take a pledge as a couple, and choose to give 10% of combined income, we have many people who are married or in long term relationships who have taken a 10% Pledge, and give 10% of their own income, and do not factor in their partnerâs income.
So two answer your two questions in short:
no, you donât need to both take the 10% Pledge or give 10% of combined income
yes, you can just pledge as an individual, and give 10% of your individual income
If you have any further questions, you can get in touch with us at community@givingwhatwecan.org
I do really think that donating thoughtfully in ways that mean that someone is statistically living because of the interventions youâve funded is just something to be really proud of.
I also wanted to say that I think itâs truly okay to also value making your own life more enjoyable, alongside improving the lives of others. I choose to donate at least 10% of my income, but I also spend money on many things I donât needâbut I value a rich life full of diverse experiences as well as helping others, and I donât feel bad about it! Iâm fulfilling my goal of being a net positive addition to the world, and enjoying my life :) I wanted to add this because I think people in the EA Community often hold themselves to extremely high moral standards!
One quick GWWC tooling note: If you take a Trial Pledge (starting a 1% of income for at least 6 months) or 10% Pledge, we have really nice dashboards and graphs that help track your donations over time!
Iâm going to rattle off some loose thoughts (mostly just speculation and intuition) - but I think this deserves a deeper interrogation another time:
- I think Australiaâs takes on EA and to some extent evidence-based development are influenced by Peter Singer. Many university educated people are aware of Peter and his workâthis is an outlier globally! I think this has driven outsized early interest in effective altruism
- I think the fact that Australia has more economic/âsocial equality than other comparative countries like US and UK probably means that Aussies perceive ourselves as âluckyâ comparative to other countriesâand I think are less likely to default to âcharity begins at homeâ. (I donât think this is sufficient to drive action, but maybe is a useful factor)
- A high proportion of Aussies are either first or second gen migrantsâI wonder how that interacts with seeing/âfeeling the needâI think thereâs lots to explore hereâfor example some of my Indian /â Chinese friends think that development is likely best done through growing the economy as this is how their parents moved from poverty to wealth.