Error
Unrecognized LW server error:
Field "fmCrosspost" of type "CrosspostOutput" must have a selection of subfields. Did you mean "fmCrosspost { ... }"?
Unrecognized LW server error:
Field "fmCrosspost" of type "CrosspostOutput" must have a selection of subfields. Did you mean "fmCrosspost { ... }"?
The Late Bronze Age collapse is an interesting case I’d love to see more work on. Thanks a lot for posting this.
I once spent 1h looking into this as part of a literature review training exercise. Like you, I got the impression that there likely was a complex set of interacting causes rather than a single one. I also got the sense, perhaps even more so than you, that the scope, coherence, dating, and causes are somewhat controversial and uncertain. In particular, I got the impression that it’s not clear whether the eruption of the Hekla volcano played a causal role since some (but not all) papers estimate it occurred after the collapse.
I’ll paste my notes below, but obviously take them with a huge grain of salt given that I spent only 1h looking into this and had no prior familiarity with the topic.
Late Bronze Age collapse, also known as 3.2 ka event
Wikipedia:
Eastern Mediterranean
Quick: 50 years, 1200-1150 BCE
Causes: “Several factors probably played a part, including climatic changes (such as those caused by volcanic eruptions), invasions by groups such as the Sea Peoples, the effects of the spread of iron-based metallurgy, developments in military weapons and tactics, and a variety of failures of political, social and economic systems.”
In a recent paper, Knapp & Manning (2016) conclude the collapse had several causes and more research is needed to fully understand them:
While I’ll mostly focus on causes, note that also the scope of the collapse and associated societal transformation is at least somewhat controversial. E.g. Small:
By contrast, Dickinson:
Causes that have been discussed in the literature
Environmental
[This PNAS paper argues against climate-based causes, but at first glance seems to be about a slightly later collapse in Northwest Europe.]
Hekla volcano eruption, maybe also other volcano eruptions
But dating controversial: “dates for the Hekla 3 eruption range from 1021 BCE (±130)[36] to 1135 BCE (±130)[37] and 929 BCE (±34).[38][39]” (Wikipedia)
Buckland et al. (1997) appear to argue against volcano-hypotheses, except for a few specific cities
Drought
Bernard Knapp; Sturt w. Manning (2016). “Crisis in Context: The End of the Late Bronze Age in the Eastern Mediterranean”. American Journal of Archaeology. 120: 99
Kaniewski et al. (2015) – review of drought-based theories
Matthews (2015)
Langguth et al. (2014)
Weiss, Harvey (June 1982). “The decline of Late Bronze Age civilization as a possible response to climatic change”. Climatic Change. 4 (2): 173–198
Middleton, Guy D. (September 2012). “Nothing Lasts Forever: Environmental Discourses on the Collapse of Past Societies”. Journal of Archaeological Research. 20 (3): 257–307
Earthquakes
Considered but refuted by Drews (1993).
Particularly for Crete?
Epidemics (mentioned by Knapp & Manning)
Outside invasion
By unidentified ‘Sea Peoples’
For Greece: by ‘Dorians’
“Despite nearly 200 years of investigation, the historicity of a mass migration of Dorians into Greece has never been established, and the origin of the Dorians remains unknown.” (Wikipedia)
Cline, Eric H. (2014). “1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed”. Princeton University Press.
Cline (2014) is dismissed by Knapp & Manning (2016)
By broader ‘great migrations’ of peoples from Northern and Central Europe into the East Mediterranean
Dickinson against invasion theories: “General loss of faith in ‘invasion theories’ as explanations of cultural change, doubts about the value of the Greek legends as sources for Bronze Age history, and closer dating of the sequence of archaeological phases have undermined the credibility of this reconstruction, and other explanations for the collapse have been proposed.”
Technology (as a cause for why the chariot-based armies of the Late Bronze Age civilizations became non-competitive)
Ironworking
Palmer, Leonard R (1962). Mycenaeans and Minoans: Aegean Prehistory in the Light of the Linear B Tablets. New York, Alfred A. Knopf
Changes in warfare: large infantry armies with new (bronze) weapons
Drews, R. (1993). The End of the Bronze Age: Changes in Warfare and the Catastrophe ca. 1200 B.C. (Princeton)
Internal problems
“political struggles within the dominant polities” (mentioned by Knapp & Manning)
“inequalities between centers and peripheries” (mentioned by Knapp & Manning)
Synthesis: general systems collapse a la Tainter
Types of evidence
“material, textual, climatic, chronological” (Knapp & Manning 2016)
Textual evidence very scarce (Robbins)
Archeological evidence inconclusive, can be interpreted in different ways (Robbins)
Thank you for your notes. Really quite interesting. I was not aware that the dating of the Hekla eruption was so disputed. The reason I focussed on it was that droughts seemed to me like they played a crucial role. The research by Drake et al. argued (relying on isotope data) that this drought was caused by a cooling of the sea, which in turn needs an explanation. And the most likely explanation seemed to be a volcanic eruption.
But I agree that it is overall very hard to understand the timing of all those events. Especially as it played out differently in different parts of the region. In some regions maybe the pandemic struck first, while it was migration or drought in others. I had hoped to highlight this complex web in my second figure.
Thanks! Interesting to hear what kind of evidence we have that points toward droughts and volcanic eruptions.
Note that overall I’m very uncertain how much to discount the Hekla eruption as a key cause based on the uncertain dating. This is literally just based on one sentence in a Wikipedia article, and I didn’t consult any of the references. It certainly seems conceivable to me that we could have sufficiently many and strong other sources of evidence that point to a volcanic eruption that we overall should have very high credence that the eruption of Hekla or another volcano was a crucial cause.
Guys, great post and discussion. I was taking a look at the discussion about Hekla’s role… even if the eruption succeeded the breakdown of those civilizations by half a century, it’d likely have an effect concerning their prospects for recovery.
Wow, vulcano erupting, a famine, an earthquake, a pandemic, civil wars and rioting sea people, that’s quite a task. Really interesting read, thanks for writing it! And the graph ended up really nicely.
This argument didn’t seem super watertight to me. There seems to be a lot of randomness involved, and causal factors at play that are unrelated to societal structure, no? For example maybe the other eruption was a little bit weaker, or the year before yielded enough food to store? Or maybe the wind was stronger in that year or something? Would be interesting to hear why the mono- and/or some of the duo-causal historians disagree with societal structure mattering.
I wondered how much this is an understatement. I have no idea of how people thought back then, only the vague idea that the people that spend the most time trying to make sense of things like this were religious leaders and highly confused about bascially everything?
Lastly, your warnings of tipping points and the problems around the breakdown of trade reminded me of these arguments from Tyler Cowen, warning that the current trade war between China and the US and the strains from the current pandemic could lead to a sudden breakdown of international trade, too.
Thank you. Yeah when I wrote this down I was a bit shocked myself on how many bad things can happen at the same time.
You’re are right that the argument about the comparison with the other eruption is a bit flaky. The problem is that this is so long ago and most written sources were destroyed. So, we have to rely on climatic reconstructions and those are hard. Therefore, I found accounts that both eruptions were of similar strength, but also some which argued that one of them was stronger than the other. However, the earlier eruption happened smack in the middle of the Bronze Age empires, while the one during the collapse happened in Iceland. So, I would also be very interested in the opinion of someone about this who spend a career on it.
To your second argument: I agree that we have vastly more ressources and knowledge now. The problem is that it seems to me that our power to destroy ourselves increased as well and the society seems much more unlikely to recover when a really bad disaster would strike. So, my feeling is that stabilizing and destabilizing factors increased in a similar magnitude.
Thank you for the article from Cowen. I see this danger as well. Such topics always remind of this article. It is mainly a rant about programmers, but it also touches on the problem that much of our infrastructure will be very difficult to restart once its stopped, because so much of it are just improvised stopgap solutions.
I could not really fit this neatly in the text, but the destruction of Ugarit was the scene for a grim, yet fascinating bit of history that I do not want to withhold from you. During some archeological excavations clay tablets were found with the following text:
“My father, behold, the enemy’s ships came (here); my cities(?) were burned, and they did evil things in my country. Does not my father know that all my troops and chariots(?) are in the Land of Hatti, and all my ships are in the Land of Lukka?… Thus, the country is abandoned to itself. May my father know it: the seven ships of the enemy that came here inflicted much damage upon us.“
This was a desperate call for help, but we were only able to dig up those clay tablets, because the clay was baked by the city burning down around them and the tablets were buried beneath the rubble of the destroyed city. I think this is a stark reminder of what can happen when civilization collapses.