Open and Welcome Thread: August 2020
If you have something to share that shouldnāt be its own post, add it here!
(You can also create a Shortform post.)
If youāre new to the EA Forum, you can use this thread to introduce yourself! You could talk about how you found effective altruism, what causes you work on and care about, or personal details that arenāt EA-related at all.
(You can also put this info into your Forum bio.)
If youāre new to effective altruism, consider checking out the Motivation Series (a collection of classic articles on EA). You can also learn more about how the Forum works on this page.
For some reason it felt quite weird for me to write a bio and I avoided doing that before, even though I think itās very important for our community to get to know each other more personally. So I thought I might use this chance to introduce myself and finally write a bio š
My name is Edo, Iām one of the co-organisers of EA Israel. Iām also helping out in moderation for the forum, feel free to reach out if I can help with anything.
I have studied mathematics, worked as an mathematical researcher in the IDF and was in training and leadership roles. After that I started a PhD in CS, where I helped to start a research center with the goal of advancing Biological research using general mathematical abstractions. After about 6 months I have decided to leave the center and the PhD program.
Currently, Iām mostly thinking about improving the scientific ecosystem and particularly how one can prioritize better within basic science.
Generally, Iām very excited about improving prioritisation within EA and how we conduct our research around it and EA causes in general. Iām also very interested in better coordination and initiative support within the EA community. Well, Iām pretty excited about the EA community and basically everything else that has to do with doing the most good.
My Virtue Ethic brain parts really appreciates honesty and openness, curiosity and self-improvement, caring and supporting, productivity and goal-orientedness, cooperating as the default option and fixing broken systems.
Thanks for introducing yourself! Remember to include this information in your actual Forum bio, too :-)
Ah thanks! I think I didnāt click āSaveā š¤¦āāļø
Hi all! Iām Litawn. I found EA through my interest in rationality (Lesswrong, SSC). I was involved with Stanford Effective Altruism, but mostly am a serial lurker. I want to start engaging more with the community and EA in general, as I can see that there is a lot to learn.
My interests are usually in fundamental questions as well as pragmatic ones. I like thinking about big questions like the far future, the fate of the universe, nature of life, etc. Iām inherently drawn to these sorts of things.
I also care about improving human coordination and raising the sanity water line. I want more people to feel like they have the ability to make a positive difference, and for their efforts to be fruitful.
Hi Litawn! Hope youāve enjoyed the lurker life, and that youāll enjoy engaging more in future :)
And I look forward to maybe seeing your comments or posts on those big questions!
Hello! Itās good to have you here, as a lurker or a poster. I wish people used the phrase āsanity waterlineā more; that may be my favorite part of the old-school CFAR mission (whether or not itās still relevant to their work now).
Hello!
Iām new to effective altruism, and also to online forums in general. Iām interested in philanthropy, charity, altruism, and more generally, giving. Regarding personal or biographical information, if itās okay I would prefer to remain anonymous. Nonetheless I would love to have the opportunity to potentially become part of the community.
If possible I would like some guidance as to the right organisations to donate money to. I hope this is the right place to post this (if not, perhaps I could be pointed in the right direction?). I hope my post is not too detailed! I have chosen this forum to ask this question because I am particularly interested in effective altruism.
I would like to give money to between 1 and 4+ organisations. Iāve researched the topic and am considering EAās Global Health and Development Fund; the Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN); the Fistula Foundation; and ChildFund. I am also strongly considering giving money in order to attempt to help the COVID-19 crisis; and to attempt to help the global warming situation (especially in Africa). Iām considering other organisations and causes, but so far these are the primary ones.
Perhaps I could learn your perspective(s) regarding this. Again, if this is not the place to ask this question, perhaps I could learn where that place may be. Regardless, effective altruism has appealed to me for a long time and I would love to have the opportunity to become part of the community in some way.
Thanks a lot!
Welcome!
The Global Health and Development Fund that you mentioned would be a good choice. Note that the fundās 2 most recent payouts have been related to respiratory disease including COVID-19, which fits with what youāre interested in supporting (see the Payout Reports section of the fundās page).
For more COVID-19 donation opportunities, see the post Prioritizing COVID-19 interventions & individual donations.
For charities working on global warming, see Founders Pledge climate change recommendations.
Thanks a lot for your advice!
I just want to second the encouragements for people to consider making shortform postsāas well as just full posts (see also) - and to make Forum bios.
Iāve found a lot of shortform posts quite interesting.
And I like that Forum bios let me get a rough sense of peopleās backgrounds, their interests, and/āor what theyāre up to. It seems like that helps a little with making this feel like a community, with making it easier to connect with people who have relevant backgrounds/āinterests/āprojects, and with reducing how often Iām left wondering who the hell are all these usernames from the void with fascinating thoughts!
Hi all, Iām Celia. I first got involved with Effective Altruism a few years ago, mostly EA London. After trying a few different things to do the most good with my skill set, I settled in charity fundraising, working for WaterAid, then the NSPCC, and now in Hand in Hand International, a small, efficient charity which lifts communities out of poverty with a proven four step model that creates sustainable income. I have a particular interest in International Development and Iām also interested in how fundraising works and how to make it more effective.
Welcome to the Forum! Itās always great to have more people in the community with practical experience working in the developing world.
Hi everyone! Iām Aman, an undergrad at USC currently majoring in computational neuroscience (though that might change). Iām very new to EA, so I havenāt yet had the chance to be involved with any EA groups, but I would love to start participating more with the community. I found EA after spending a few months digging into artificial general intelligence, and itās been great to read everyoneās thoughts about how to turn vague moral intuitions into concrete action plans.
I have a soft spot for the standard big-picture philosophy/āphysics topics, like the nature of intelligence and meta-ethics and epistemology and theories of everything, but also the wildly unpragmatic questions (like whether we might consider directing ourselves into a time loop once heat death comes around, if itās possible).
As a career, I tentatively want to focus on improving global governance capacity, since Iām inclined to think that it might ultimately determine how well EA-related research and prioritization can be implemented (and also how well we are able to handle x- and s-risks, and capitalize on safe AI). I realize that this is probably one of the least tractable goals to have, so I might end up working in another area, like international development, mental health, science policy, or something else entirely. Amusingly, all the EA career advice out there has only made me more confused about what I should be doing (but Iām probably approaching it wrong).
Anyway, Iām excited to be here and grateful for the opportunity to start interacting with the EA community!
Has anyone looked into the implications of deepfakes? To me, it seems like a highly impactful technology that will obstruct the use of the internet as an information-gathering tool, among other things.
Towards measuring poverty costs of covid from economic disruption: https://āāblogs.worldbank.org/āādevelopmenttalk/āālives-or-livelihoods-global-estimates-mortality-and-poverty-costs-covid-19
Curious to know what people here think about the āunusual causesā tag.
This comes across to me as a bit deprecating so I was thinking that perhaps the name should be changed to something a bit more neutral. Perhaps ānon-standard-causesā. Or even something that might be biased the other way like āunderdiscussed-causesā.
Aaron Gertler gave the answer that
So Iād take his view over mine, since Iām not a native english speaker. Still, interested in what you think and what other alternatives are there.
Generally, I think that this tag could be very important for the discovery of new causes so I think that an appropriate name might be important
Iām also not a native English speaker; to my ears, āunusual causesā feels similar in connotation to ānon-standard causesā. What about simply āother causesā?
This feels good to me. One problem that may have (but Iām not sure about it) is that it might not capture new causes that are contained in another meta-cause. So for instance, the post about M-Risk is related to policy or x-risk, but is clearly a new cause by itself and yet it may feel inappropriate to vote on it as āother causesā.
Iām a native English speaker, and to me āunusual causesā and ānon-standard causesā feel similar in connotation, and neither strikes me as feeling deprecating. Though I can see how āunusualā could imply the cause is weird, whereas really we just want to say itās not usually discussed. āNon-standardā avoids that, but seems like an uncommon phrase.
Iām against āunder-discussedā, as that bakes in the judgement that this should be more discussed. Iād say the same about āOverlookedā or āNeglectedā. āLess discussed causesā or āLess commonly discussed causesā avoids that, but is perhaps a little long (though the former is only as long as āUnder-discussed causesā).
Iām a bit against āother causesā, though Iām less sure why. Maybe āotherā actually feels more deprecating to me, which is maybe in turn because Iāve been exposed to the term āThe Otherā in some social science courses.
My vote might be for āLess discussed causesā.