My statements here do not necessarily reflect the views of any of my employers.
My questions
Do many research organisations (within or outside of EA) make theory of change (ToC) diagrams? If not, why not?
Do many research orgs make ToC diagrams, but not make them publicly accessible? If so, why?
Should more research orgs make ToC diagrams? Why or why not?
Should more research orgs make their ToC diagrams publicly accessible? Why or why not?
(You donāt need to answer all four questions; feel free to just address one of them, or just say what some org you know about does and why, or whatever.)
Theory of Change (ToC) is a specific type of methodology for planning, participation, and evaluation that is used in companies, philanthropy, not-for-profit and government sectors to promote social change. Theory of Change defines long-term goals and then maps backward to identify necessary preconditions.[1]
Theory of Change explains the process of change by outlining causal linkages in an initiative, i.e., its shorter-term, intermediate, and longer-term outcomes.
I havenāt read the whole of that article, and Iām not an expert on ToC methodologies. When I say ātheory of change diagramsā, I essentially just mean flowcharts/ācausal diagrams showing how an organisation thinks the concrete actions they plan to take might connect to the outcomes they ultimately care about causing. (Please let me know if thatās me stretching the jargon too far.)
Hereās an example of a ToC diagram, from the EA org Happier Lives Institute (source):
And hereās a ToC diagram I participated in creating, from the EA org Convergence Analysis (which I worked for until recently) (source):
(See the relevant section of Convergenceās strategic plan for more explanation and context. One relevant excerpt is: āWe have refrained from showing arrows to connect each activity or outcome to those it helps bring about. This is partly because there are so many connections, and we wished to avoid cluttering the diagram.ā)
It seems to me that it might be quite useful for research orgs to make ToC diagrams. But I havenāt actually seen any examples of ToC diagrams from research orgs except the two shown above. This has led me to wonder about the four questions stated above.
[Question] Do research organisations make theory of change diagrams? Should they?
My statements here do not necessarily reflect the views of any of my employers.
My questions
Do many research organisations (within or outside of EA) make theory of change (ToC) diagrams? If not, why not?
Do many research orgs make ToC diagrams, but not make them publicly accessible? If so, why?
Should more research orgs make ToC diagrams? Why or why not?
Should more research orgs make their ToC diagrams publicly accessible? Why or why not?
(You donāt need to answer all four questions; feel free to just address one of them, or just say what some org you know about does and why, or whatever.)
Context
According to Wikipedia:
I havenāt read the whole of that article, and Iām not an expert on ToC methodologies. When I say ātheory of change diagramsā, I essentially just mean flowcharts/ācausal diagrams showing how an organisation thinks the concrete actions they plan to take might connect to the outcomes they ultimately care about causing. (Please let me know if thatās me stretching the jargon too far.)
Hereās an example of a ToC diagram, from the EA org Happier Lives Institute (source):
And hereās a ToC diagram I participated in creating, from the EA org Convergence Analysis (which I worked for until recently) (source):
(See the relevant section of Convergenceās strategic plan for more explanation and context. One relevant excerpt is: āWe have refrained from showing arrows to connect each activity or outcome to those it helps bring about. This is partly because there are so many connections, and we wished to avoid cluttering the diagram.ā)
It seems to me that it might be quite useful for research orgs to make ToC diagrams. But I havenāt actually seen any examples of ToC diagrams from research orgs except the two shown above. This has led me to wonder about the four questions stated above.