TagLast edit: 12 Jun 2021 14:40 UTC by Pablo

Totalitarianism is an all-embracing system of government that exercises virtually complete control over every aspect of individual life. Robust totalitarianism may be defined as a type of totalitarianism particularly effective at enforcing its ideological vision and preventing internal and external threats to its authority.


Benito Mussolini famously characterized totalitarianism as “all within the state, nothing outside the state, none against the state.” (Mussolini 1956) Contemporary scholars have listed several distinctive features of totalitarian regimes. These features include a radical official ideology, usually exclusionary and future-oriented; a single party, typically led by one man; a monopoly of the means of both persuasion and coercion; a centrally planned economy, in which most professional activities are part of the state; and extreme polarization and widespread use of terror in all spheres of life (Friedrich & Brzezinski 1965: 22; Aron 1965: ch. 15; Holmes 2001). Totalitarian regimes are estimated to have been responsible for the deaths of over 125 million people in the 20th century, mostly in the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, and communist China (Bernholz 2000: 568). To this tragic loss of life needs to be added the major loss of quality of life experienced by those living under such regimes.

Robust totalitarianism as a catastrophic and existential risk

Because of its scale, the threat of robust totalitarianism constitutes a global catastrophic risk. If the totalitarian regime has the potential to be both global and stable, it could also constitute an existential risk—specifically a risk of an unrecoverable dystopia.

Advances in artificial intelligence in areas such as lie detection, social persuasion and deception, autonomous weapons and ubiquitous surveillance could entrench existing totalitarian regimes. These developments may also cause democracies to slide into totalitarianism (Dafoe 2018: sect. 4.1). On the other hand, AI could conceivably destabilize totalitarian systems or protect against their emergence (Adamczewski 2019: sect. ‘Robust totalitarianism’). To this date, no detailed analysis exists of the potential impact of artificial intelligence on the risk of robust totalitarianism. The literature on robust totalitarianism in general is itself very small (Caplan 2008). Research in this area is thus of high expected value (Koehler 2020: sect. ‘Risks of stable totalitarianism’).


Adamczewski, Tom (2019) A shift in arguments for AI risk, Fragile Credences, May 25.

Aird, Michael (2020) Collection of sources related to dystopias and “robust totalitarianism”, Effective Altruism Forum, March 30.
Many additional resources on this topic.

Aron, Raymond (1965) Démocratie et totalitarisme, Paris: Gallimard.

Bernholz, Peter (2000) Totalitarianism, in Charles K. Rowley & Friedrich Schneider (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Public Choice, Boston: Springer, pp. 892–897.

Caplan, Bryan (2008) The totalitarian threat, in Nick Bostrom & Milan M. Ćirković (eds.) Global Catastrophic Risks, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 504–519.

Dafoe, Allan (2018) AI governance: A research agenda, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford.

Friedrich, Carl J. & Zbigniew K. Brzezinski (1965) Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Holmes, Leslie (2001) Totalitarianism, in Neil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 15788–15791.

Koehler, Arden (2020) Problem areas beyond 80,000 Hours’ current priorities, Effective Altruism Forum, June 22.

Mussolini, Benito (1932) ‘La dottrina del fascismo’, in Enciclopedia italiana di scienze, lettere ed arti, Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.

Related entries

dystopia | global governance

Cause Area: Hu­man Rights in North Korea

Denis Drescher20 Nov 2017 20:52 UTC
59 points
12 comments20 min readEA link

Re­duc­ing long-term risks from malev­olent actors

David_Althaus29 Apr 2020 8:55 UTC
262 points
65 comments37 min readEA link

A New X-Risk Fac­tor: Brain-Com­puter Interfaces

Jack10 Aug 2020 10:24 UTC
55 points
11 comments41 min readEA link

Some his­tory top­ics it might be very valuable to investigate

MichaelA8 Jul 2020 2:40 UTC
83 points
34 comments6 min readEA link

Com­mon ground for longtermists

Tobias_Baumann29 Jul 2020 10:26 UTC
65 points
8 comments4 min readEA link

Venn di­a­grams of ex­is­ten­tial, global, and suffer­ing catastrophes

MichaelA15 Jul 2020 12:28 UTC
61 points
2 comments7 min readEA link

[Re­view and notes] How Democ­racy Ends—David Runciman

Louis_Dixon13 Feb 2020 22:30 UTC
30 points
1 comment5 min readEA link

Prob­lem ar­eas be­yond 80,000 Hours’ cur­rent pri­ori­ties

Ardenlk22 Jun 2020 12:49 UTC
257 points
62 comments15 min readEA link

[Question] Books on au­thor­i­tar­i­anism, Rus­sia, China, NK, demo­cratic back­slid­ing, etc.?

MichaelA2 Feb 2021 3:52 UTC
10 points
20 comments1 min readEA link

Ben Garfinkel: The fu­ture of surveillance

EA Global8 Jun 2018 7:51 UTC
8 points
0 comments11 min readEA link

Is Democ­racy a Fad?

Ben Garfinkel13 Mar 2021 12:40 UTC
125 points
34 comments18 min readEA link

Some thoughts on risks from nar­row, non-agen­tic AI

richard_ngo19 Jan 2021 0:07 UTC
34 points
2 comments8 min readEA link

How democ­racy ends: a re­view and reevaluation

richard_ngo24 Nov 2018 17:41 UTC
24 points
2 commentsEA link