I am a veterinary professional committed to advancing animal welfare and sustainable farming practices. My work is ensuring that interventions create the greatest positive impact for both animals and the communities that depend on them. As a co-founder of Vetconekt Initiative Uganda and Aquatic Futures Africa, I have led initiatives that promote humane livestock, poultry farming, and humane pet ownership practices, advocating for higher-welfare systems that are both ethical and economically viable.
Dr Kassim
Karma: 274
Replacing general EA conferences with cause-area-specific ones would enable deeper collaboration, better-aligned networking, and more focused problem-solving by concentrating expertise and attention on the most pressing challenges within each field.
Field-building in areas like AI safety or global health is important, but without continued investment in building Effective Altruism as a movement and framework, we risk losing the moral clarity, intellectual rigor, and talent pipeline that make those fields effective in the first place.
[Question] Fighting to exist, forgetting to live. Suggesting a missing priority in EA thinking
I first read the Epic of Gilgamesh in campus and thought, “cool, ancient dude fights monsters.” But now, years later after a burnout, trying to do good in the world I reread it and it hit so differently.
Gilgamesh wasn’t just scared of death he was scared of insignificance. Of trying really hard and it still not mattering. Sound familiar?
That’s the part that resonates deeply with me in EA. Whether I’m donating, researching, working on a cause area there’s always this quiet background voice:
“What if none of this matters?”
“What if I’m wrong?”
“What if it’s not enough?”But I take comfort in how Gilgamesh ended his journey. He didn’t solve death. He didn’t have perfect information. He just built something that helped others.
Maybe that’s enough. Maybe that’s impact.
Would love to hear how you all think about this kind of emotional side of doing good. Do you wrestle with that same existential doubt? Or do you lean into it?
4,000 years ago, Gilgamesh asked the hardest EA question “Will anything I do actually matter?”
I’ve recently been learning about Nick Laing’s impactful work and, as a Ugandan newly introduced to Effective Altruism (EA), I’m gaining a deeper appreciation for its principles. However, I’ve noticed that the rigorous frameworks often employed by larger organizations can sometimes be based on inadequate or overly academic data, typically derived from peer-reviewed journals. Such information, although scientifically credible, often prioritizes the interests of journals and reviewers rather than fully capturing the real on-the-ground contexts. This approach frequently leads to an idealistic rather than realistic representation of local situations, reducing the effectiveness of funded projects. Furthermore, there tends to be a bias towards global contexts, which may attract more attention but overlook critical local nuances. As a result, the interventions supported can sometimes become disconnected from practical realities, diminishing their applicability and effectiveness on the ground. I would greatly appreciate insights or suggestions on how we might bridge this gap and ensure our frameworks and strategies more accurately reflect and respond to local needs.
this great and I’m eager to connect with and learn from those who’ve been part of this community for a longer time. While interacting with LLMs has been helpful, I’ve noticed that responses sometimes feel generic or disconnected from practical realities. Insights from experienced community members who offer fresh perspectives grounded in real-world contexts are incredibly valuable. Such contributions greatly enhance the relevance and effectiveness of our ideas, making them more achievable and better tailored to the local environments of the beneficiaries we aim to support. I’d greatly appreciate any practical advice, experiences, or suggestions you might share. Thank you!
Thanks, Cullen
I really appreciate this perspective. The idea that EA is a question rather than an ideology really resonates, especially when thinking about the diversity of approaches within the movement. It’s reassuring to know that many of these debates about long termism, AI safety, and earning-to-give aren’t settled, but rather ongoing discussions that reflect different ways of reasoning about impact. Coming from a background in fish welfare and food systems in Uganda, I see similar tensions how do we balance immediate suffering with long-term change? How do we integrate global priorities with local realities? And how do we ensure that interventions remain relevant in the face of political and economic uncertainty? It’s exciting to engage with a community that embraces these complexities, and I look forward to thinking through these questions alongside others who share the goal of doing the most good. THIS IS SURELY THE MOST GOOD.
I get that AI could reshape everything, but does that mean we should deprioritize issues like factory farming, poverty, or malaria problems causing real suffering right now? AI isn’t inherently good or bad; it depends on how humans use it. If anything, shouldn’t we be asking how AI can support existing EA causes rather than assuming everything else becomes irrelevant? Feels like we might be overcorrecting here.
Am I Missing Something, or Is EA? Thoughts from a Learner in Uganda
Yes, we should bury the toxic waste if leaving it uncontained would cause an existential catastrophe. If the risk does not reach that threshold, then the answer is no. The well-being of the 100 people we save today must be weighed against the suffering of thousands in the future. While we have certainty about the immediate impact, our projections for long-term harm remain probabilistic—but the potential scale of suffering makes this risk morally significant. Ethical decision-making in such cases is fraught with uncertainty, yet prioritizing actions that maximize overall well-being remains our guiding principle. This is the kind of trade-off no one would want to make, but moral responsibility compels us to act with the best available evidence.
Similarly, my enthusiasm for a donation might be lower if my primary goal were to save a life specifically within the next five years. However, my commitment is to maximize lives saved, regardless of the time frame. A life saved today holds the same intrinsic value as a life saved decades or even centuries from now. let us aim to allocate resources where they generate the greatest long-term impact, ensuring that our actions create the most significant positive difference over time.
Part A Estimating the Impact of Donating 10% of My Lifetime Income
I’ve always been fascinated by the idea that a single decision, like where to donate money, could have an impact that stretches across communities and even generations. If I were to donate 10% of my lifetime income, say $100,000, I’d want to ensure it goes somewhere it can do the most good. I explored three top charities recommended by GiveWell the Against Malaria Foundation (AMF), Malaria Consortium, and Helen Keller International. And here is what i would go for.
Against Malaria Foundation (AMF)
AMF distributes insecticide-treated bed nets to protect people from malaria, one of the world’s deadliest diseases. According to GiveWell, it costs around $3,000 to $5,500 to save one life through AMF’s programs.If I donated $100,000, that could save about 18 lives, preventing families from losing loved ones to an entirely preventable disease.
Malaria Consortium
This organization runs a program called Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention (SMC), which provides preventive medication to children during peak malaria seasons. Studies suggest that SMC significantly reduces malaria cases and deaths.While the exact number of lives saved per dollar isn’t as clearly defined as AMF’s, a donation of $100,000 would protect thousands of children and prevent untold suffering.
Helen Keller International
This charity focuses on fighting vitamin A deficiency, which causes blindness and weakens immune systems in children. Their supplementation programs are cost-effective and have been linked to significant reductions in child mortality.A donation of $100,000 could fund vitamin A supplements for hundreds of thousands of children, improving their health and chances of survival.
Part B Where Would I Donate $1,000?
If I had to choose just one of these organizations to donate $1,000 to, I would pick the Against Malaria Foundation (AMF).
Why? Because AMF has a well-documented track record, and the cost-effectiveness of their work is clear. Knowing that a simple bed net could mean the difference between life and death for a child makes this an easy decision for me. Even with just $1,000, I could contribute to protecting dozens of people from malaria, and that’s a tangible impact I’d feel good about.
Part C Applying This Approach to Other Life Decisions
This exercise made me think about how I can use a similar approach in my own life, beyond charitable giving. Here are some decisions I will be using a cost benefit analysis to
Career Choices I will compare potential salaries, job satisfaction, and long-term stability when deciding on a career path. A high-paying job might look great on paper, but if it comes at the expense of happiness and well-being, is it really worth it?
Education Investments Before enrolling in a degree or training program, i will weigh the cost of tuition against potential earnings. Some degrees have a much higher return on investment than others.
Major Purchases Should I buy a house or keep renting? Instead of going with gut feeling, I will break down the numbers, mortgage costs, market trends, and long term benefits.
Health & Wellness Preventive healthcare might seem like an unnecessary expense in the moment, but if it reduces the risk of major illnesses down the road, it’s actually a great investment.
The Legacy of Njalira Kassim, A Good Ancestor
In the vast, rolling plateaus of Eastern Uganda, where the morning mist clings to the golden rice fields and the rivers hum with life, the name Njalira Kassim is spoken with deep respect. He was more than just a man; he was a visionary, a guide, and a builder of a future he knew he would never see. But his legacy? That would live on forever.
Njalira Kassim my great-grandfather was the man who brought Islam to our village, not just as a religion, but as a path to morality, discipline, and unity. In a time when conflicts brewed over simple disputes, and people lost their way in the absence of strong values, he stood firm, teaching that true strength lay in kindness, honesty, and faith. Under the shade of an ancient fig tree, he gathered the community and spoke of compassion, justice, and humility. His words took root, and over time, they transformed the very fabric of our village.
But his wisdom stretched far beyond faith. He saw the land for what it was a gift, not just for his time, but for generations yet to come. The vast swamps that now nourish our rice fields might have been lost if not for his foresight. He worked tirelessly to protect them, ensuring that the people who relied on them would always have food, stability, and dignity. Today, when I walk through those same green paddies, I know they are more than just fields; they are his enduring promise to us.
He believed in the power of the soil and the hands that tilled it. “The land will never betray you if you respect it,” he would say, urging the community to embrace farming as a way of life. And they listened. To this day, agriculture remains the backbone of our village’s economy, just as he envisioned. He gave people a purpose, a livelihood, and most importantly, a future they could build with their own hands.
As I walk through the village, I feel the sensation of dazzling hues of birds and towering trees swaying in the breeze, whispering reminders of the great name I carry and adore Njalira Kassim. His spirit lingers in the rustling leaves, in the songs of the birds that welcome each new dawn, and in the fields that stretch endlessly, still feeding the generations he never met.
To be a good ancestor, like my great-grandfather, is to think beyond oneself to plant trees under whose shade we may never sit, to shape a world that is kinder, fairer, and more sustainable for those who follow. He lived with foresight, knowing that the choices he made would echo through time. He valued knowledge and wisdom, ensuring that his people were equipped not just to survive, but to thrive. He led with humility, understanding that true leadership is found in service, not power.
Even now, as I stand beneath the same sky he once did, I hope that one day, I too will leave behind something that matters. That I will not only be remembered for what I achieved but for what I gave to those who come after me.
Like Njalira Kassim, I, too, hope to be a good ancestor.
I get where Toby Ord is coming from when he says humanity is standing at “the precipice.” It’s a powerful way to frame the moment we’re in facing climate change (Global warming), nuclear threats, AI risks, and everything in between. But I can’t help but feel that every generation has probably felt this way to some degree with threats somehow relative to the abilities of humanity then.
Think about it if you were living through the Black Death, you might have thought the world was ending. During the Cold War, with nuclear missiles pointed in all directions, people genuinely believed civilization could be wiped out at any moment. And yet, here we are. Genuinely found ways to navigate through and mitigate the risks then and here we are.
That’s not to say we should ignore the risks. Technology is evolving fast, and the stakes are higher in some ways. But we also have more knowledge, better tools, and a greater ability to cooperate than ever before. Maybe the real challenge isn’t just avoiding catastrophe but figuring out how to keep moving forward in a way that protects our future.
Really appreciate you @mal_graham🔸 thinking out loud on this. Watching from Uganda, I totally get the frustration the US climate feels increasingly hostile to science and progressive work like wild animal welfare. So yeah, shifting more focus to the UK/EU makes sense, especially if it helps stabilize research and morale. That said, if you’re already rethinking geography and community building, I’d gently suggest looking beyond the usual Global North pivots. Regions like East Africa are incredibly underrepresented but ecologically critical and honestly, there’s a small but growing base of people here hungry to build this field with proper support. If there’s ever a window to make this movement more global and future-proof, it might be now. Happy to chat more if useful.