I have recently read Why We Sleep (a nice book review) by Matthew Walker PhD (AKA Sleep Diplomat).
The book explains about the benefits of sleeping enough and the negative consequences of not sleeping enough, based on scientific research.
It also explains how this problem is neglected. For example, a short snippet from the book about driving:
At the highest levels, we need better public campaigns educating the population about sleep. We spend a tiny fraction of our transportation safety budget warning people of the dangers of drowsy driving compared with the countless campaigns and awareness efforts regarding accidents linked to drugs or alcohol. This despite the fact that drowsy driving is responsible for more accidents than either of these two issues—and is more deadly. Governments could save hundreds of thousands of lives each year if they mobilized such a campaign. It would easily pay for itself, based on the cost savings to the health-care and emergency services bills that drowsy-driving accidents impose. It would of course help lower health-care and auto insurance rates and premiums for individuals.
And:
I conducted an informal survey of colleagues, friends, and family in the United States and in my home country of the United Kingdom. I also sampled friends and colleagues from Spain, Greece, Australia, Germany, Israel, Japan, South Korea, and Canada.
[...]
0 percent received any educational materials or information about sleep.
(Of course, this is anecdotal evidence, but I don’t think there is a question about the extremely low amount of hours schools dedicate to educating about sleep.)
The book also claims the sleep loss epidemic is a large-scale problem:
This silent sleep loss epidemic is the greatest public health challenge we face in the twenty-first century in developed nations.
And:
Insufficient sleep robs most nations of more than 2 percent of their GDP
(With regard to the last claim, the book references RAND Corporation, Lack of Sleep Costing UK Economy Up to £40 Billion a Year.)
I am not an expert in sleep, nor in cause selection, but this problem seems to me quite neglected (relatively to its scale), and at least partially (e.g., educating about sleep, later school start times) easy to solve (relatively to other issues).
I am less certain about its scale relatively to other global issues, but I wonder about its total score (scale+neglectedness+solvability), if it were assessed like other issues in this table by 80k Hours.
Edit: To clarify, by “the sleep loss epidemic” I refer mainly to sleep-deprived people with no sleep disorders. I assumed (please correct me if I were wrong) that sleep disorders aren’t the main cause for sleep-deprivation, which means that we mainly have to deal with seemingly-easier-to-change causes (e.g., education, social norms).
I looked into this a bit. Unfortunately the quality of evidence in sleep medicine was underwhelming, e.g. on behavioral treatments.
I apologize for not being clear enough.
I assumed (please correct me if I was wrong) that sleep disorders aren’t the main cause for sleep-deprivation, which means that we mainly have to deal with seemingly-easier-to-change causes (e.g., education, social norms).
(I edited the question to say this explicitly.)
Sleep loss is an important problem, but it’s unclear whether any charity should focus on it directly.
The problem of driving while sleep-deprived will likely be solved by robocars more than by any altruistic efforts.
The rest of the problem seems better tackled by focusing more on the stresses that cause sleep problems, and by relatively decentralized efforts to shift our cultures to be more sleep-friendly.
Sleep is something to keep in mind when asking whether EAs should donate to mental health charities or to meditation charities such as Monastic Academy. I’m very uncertain whether these charities should be considered effective enough to be EA causes.
I don’t know how much time this would take, but of course when we evaluate the scale of the problem, we should put into our calculations robocars eliminating traffic collisions at some point.
I might be overestimating the amount of people that are sleep-deprived only because they don’t prioritize sleep (due to being unaware of its benefits and the costs of being sleep-deprived (both benefits and costs are very significant, according to the book and the research it references)). But if the number of these people is not trivial, getting them to sleep more seems to me like a strong combination of scale+neglectedness+solvability.
Educating people about sleep seems easy enough, but there might be less tractable reasons why people don’t get sleep (eg young children, working two jobs) which might make this problem more difficult than it appears on the surface.
I think that’s a good point, especially with regard to young children.
With regard to jobs, if sleep is well-known to make employees more productive, maybe employers would (someway) encourage employees to get more sleep. (On the other hand, it might make employers less willing to hire people that don’t get enough sleep, but I am going deep into speculation-land here.)
I edited my phrasing from “quite solvable” to “at least partially easy to solve (relatively to other issues)”.
Thanks!
I don’t think this is a particularly good area for EAs to tackle, but I do suspect that new parents should be more informed/reminded of the dangers of driving while sleep-deprived. I remember borrowing a car to drive to a meetup for new parents and and some point realizing, “This is ridiculous. I’m so exhausted I don’t always feel confident in my ability to walk downstairs. I shouldn’t be operating heavy machinery.” Not like isolation is great for new parents either, but I needed to find ways to get out without driving.
I agree that everyone should be informed about the dangers of driving while sleep-deprived.
Would you please explain a bit about your reasoning?
No particularly strong reason. I guess it seems strange that given that it would be low cost for public health systems to issue advice about this, it’s not already happening more. Maybe the fact that no one really opposes it and it might be cheap to improve means that it’s ripe for more attention, but maybe the fact that it hasn’t already been done means EAs who aren’t already working in public health can’t do a lot.
It’s not totally neglected—there are a ton of results for “sleep deprivation epidemic,” the CDC describes sleep deprivation as a serious national problem, and my local schoolyard has a banner telling children to get 9 hours of sleep. But obviously more progress could be made.
The problem seems to be large-scale and relatively neglected, but not especially solvable. When people don’t sleep, it seems unlikely that their sleep is disordered than that they are choosing to do something else with their time (maybe an obligation like childcare, maybe some form of entertainment).
Example: While getting people to stop drinking puts “having soda/water/nothing” up against “having alcohol”, getting people to sleep more puts “unconsciousness” up against “the most important and/or entertaining thing you believe you can do instead”.
That said, there are clearly some modest interventions that could help some groups:
Apps like f.lux to reduce blue light exposure before sleep
Having schools (especially high schools) start classes later, to sync up with teen sleep schedules
Improving the quality of remote-work software to reduce commute times and help people start their days later
But none of these seem broad enough to make a significant dent in the problem, and I’m not aware of any charities that are doing obviously effective work in this area (though “starting school later” probably has some active advocates I’m not aware of).
Have you read the book or some review of it or watched/listened to some long form interview with Matthew Walker (just search in YouTube)?
I ask because I would have probably said the same if I hadn’t read it, but after reading the book, the equation for me is more like:
“unconsciousness + better memory + better processing of stuff I learned + better health + better mental health + being less hungry + feeling better while awake (+ more stuff mentioned in the book that I don’t remember at the moment)” up against “the most important and/or entertaining thing you believe you can do instead + worse memory + worse learning abilities + health problems + …”
Yes, I agree that sleep has many benefits, just as eating vegetables has many benefits (some of which are almost immediately apparent, just like the benefits of sleep). But while many people know about these, they still don’t sleep enough. I’m trying to get at the reasons I think people take these harmful actions, not arguing that sleeping as little as possible is correct/rational :-)
I knew (generally) about the benefits of sleep before I read the book, but reading the book made this “knowing” extremely more vivid.
The thing that makes me so optimistic about getting people to sleep more is that sleep is something our body actively urges us to do.
Like our body actively urges us to eat a lot of sugar (e.g., and not vegetables), it actively urges us to sleep (unless we use caffeine, etc.).
I’m biased in favor of this. I started sleeping enough when I got very ill (proper sleep on a routine schedule is the most important thing I can do besides medication to manage my disease) and it has made such a difference to my experience of life. I’m beginning to suspect overstimulation in general is a hugely underappreciated cause of pysical and psychological dysfunction.
My only hesitation is that the solutions that are forthcoming aren’t exactly in EA’s wheelhouse, but that could be because I’m not thinking creatively enough. Sleep deprivation is important and neglected, but might not be very tractable and effective solutions may or may not be scalable. There’s not some cheap supplement that everyone needs that we could just hand out. You have to be dedicated to making an against-the-grain personal behavior change to sleep more, and that’s complicated and hard. (As I say, only severe illness was able to move the needle for me.) My first thoughts are all policy solutions: later school start times, more mandatory sleep breaks for hospital workers, shift workers, etc., some way of regulating smartphones to cut into sleep less? One of those might rise to EA criteria.
I am just hopeful that reading the book (or some equivalent experience that educates one about the benefits of sleep and costs of sleep-deprivation) is enough to make some people change their sleep habits.
If I let my hopefulness run wild, I imagine these few people that changed their sleep habits (like you and me) telling their friends and families about its positive consequences, who would in turn tell their friends and families, and so on.
Also, I think that advocacy is something that the EA community can be quite effective at. For example (though it is just my guess—I don’t have evidence for that), I guess the EA community helped a lot in making people less dismissive about the risk of unaligned AI.
(Honestly, I don’t think there is any neglected problem that the EA community would be ineffective against. It seems to me that this community includes many highly capable people, and so as long as some problem is quite neglected, I am sure EAs can at least find some of the low hanging fruit, as long as they direct their attention toward that problem.)
Although I don’t think it’s a likely EA cause area, I definitely think it’s good for the world to raise awareness about the costs of sleep deprivation among EAs! I’d love to see norms in our community of respecting sleep, like not having events too late, not making them too overstimulating, not relying on alcohol to make something a social event, rejecting startup-y “always on” culture on by doing business mostly by daylight, etc.
I, like Holly, am also interested in exploring this, though have not thought rigorously about this.
A lot of people who are in power might be running low on sleep. This can jeopardize our future and is relevant to improving institutional decision making
(As Holly said) It could be good to promote sleep widely in EA circles given that we want to be optimal and it seems quite tractible to change a culture in a smaller community vs. the whole world. (Although it is my impression that EA orgs already encourage healthy work / sleep habits.)
Now we have the question: Should the EA community encourage sleep within the community more so than it does now?