RSS

Cer­tifi­cate of impact

TagLast edit: May 17, 2023, 9:32 AM by Leo

A certificate of impact (also known as an impact certificate) is a kind of altruistic instrument at the center of a funding model proposed by Paul Christiano. Certificates of impact attempt to harness the benefits of the price system in altruistic contexts, where prices are usually unavailable.

In this model, altruistic work receives some or all of its funding after completion rather than beforehand. Once an individual or organization completes work with a positive social impact, they can apply for a certificate of impact. They can then sell this certificate to another organization or individual. Following the sale, the new certificate holder can claim credit for the project’s impact, and the organization that carried out the project must acknowledge that they have sold its impact.

This scheme has been proposed and tested by some members of the effective altruism community. They argue that the scheme is better than funding incomplete projects, because it allows for payments by results rather than by effort, which better incentivizes those running the project to do a good job. They also argue that awarding certificates of impact might be simpler and clearer than pre-funding projects.

Related models

Recently, some related funding models have been proposed.

In early May 2021, the organization Noora Health—which implements educational programs for mothers of newborns in South Asia—launched a non-fungible token (NFT) which may in some respects be regarded as a certificate of impact. The auction opened with a list price of $2.5 million, and computer scientist and tech entrepreneur Paul Graham—a long-time supporter of the organization—placed the winning bid of ETH 1337, at the time worth $5.23 million.[1][2] A difference between this use of NFTs and certificates of impact as conceived by Christiano is that those bidding in the NFT auction pay for the prospect of future impact. In contrast, an impact purchase is a transaction involving the transfer of past impact.

In late July, a group of authors, in collaboration with Vitalik Buterin, proposed a model called retroactive public goods funding.[3] The model consists of a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), called “the Results Oracle”, which funds projects with high social value. The funding is done retrospectively rather than prospectively, by assessing the value of the project after it has been completed. Once the Results Oracle evaluates a project, it can send the reward to the person or group responsible for the project, or, alternatively, it can use the funds to establish a price floor for a token associated with the project. As the authors note, rewarding via a project token effectively creates a prediction market for the amount of funding the Results Oracle will decide to allocate to the project, and allows the same project to be funded multiple times or by other sources besides the Results Oracle.

Further reading

Christiano, Paul (2014) Certificates of impact, Rational Altruist, November 15.

Christiano, Paul & Katja Grace (2015a) Why certificates?, The Impact Purchase.
An explanation of the benefits of certificates of impact.

Christiano, Paul & Katja Grace (2015b) Certificates of impact, The Impact Purchase.

Hoffman, Ben (2016) Minimum viable impact purchases, Compass Rose, August 29.

Kuhn, Ben (2015) I just sold half of a blog post, Ben Kuhn’s Blog, April.
A good intuitive description of the idea of impact purchase.

Leong, Chris (2020) Making impact purchases viable, Effective Altruism Forum, April 17.

Linsefors, Linda (2020) The case for impact purchase | part 1, Effective Altruism Forum, April 14.

Rose, Eli (2020) Do impact certificates help if you’re not sure your work is effective?, Effective Altruism Forum, February 12.

Related entries

effective altruism funding | markets for altruism | prize

  1. ^

    Noora Health (2021) Save thousands of lives, OpenSea.

  2. ^

    Graham, Paul (2021) An NFT that saves lives, Paul Graham’s Website, May.

  3. ^

    Wang, Jinglan et al. (2021) Retroactive public goods funding, Ethereum Optimism Blog, July 20.

Cer­tifi­cates of impact

Paul_ChristianoNov 11, 2014, 5:22 AM
54 points
41 comments8 min readEA link

Im­pact mar­kets may in­cen­tivize pre­dictably net-nega­tive projects

OferJun 21, 2022, 1:00 PM
113 points
76 comments4 min readEA link

Ex­per­i­ment in Retroac­tive Fund­ing: An EA Fo­rum Prize Contest

DCJun 1, 2022, 9:15 PM
96 points
16 comments8 min readEA link

Ex­plain­ing Im­pact Markets

Saul MunnJan 31, 2024, 9:48 AM
13 points
1 comment3 min readEA link
(www.brasstacks.blog)

Im­pact Mar­kets: The An­noy­ing Details

Scott AlexanderJul 15, 2022, 5:34 AM
112 points
46 comments26 min readEA link

Toward Im­pact Markets

Dawn DrescherMar 15, 2022, 10:08 PM
52 points
11 comments57 min readEA link
(impactmarkets.substack.com)

Will “im­pact cer­tifi­cates” value only im­pact?

RyanCareyMar 5, 2022, 1:31 AM
17 points
15 comments5 min readEA link

Im­pact pur­chase first round results

Katja_GraceApr 10, 2015, 3:43 AM
13 points
4 comments5 min readEA link

Im­pact Cer­tifi­cates on a Blockchain

RowanBDonovanAug 3, 2021, 2:57 PM
44 points
31 comments21 min readEA link

Man­i­fund x AI Worldviews

AustinMar 31, 2023, 3:32 PM
32 points
2 comments2 min readEA link
(manifund.org)

Hyper­certs: A new prim­i­tive for pub­lic goods funding

DCSep 10, 2022, 9:43 PM
31 points
1 comment2 min readEA link
(protocol.ai)

Plan for Im­pact Cer­tifi­cate MVP

lifelonglearnerOct 1, 2020, 9:54 PM
42 points
13 comments1 min readEA link
(whalerdao.org)

Man­i­fund: 2023 in Review

AustinJan 18, 2024, 11:50 PM
29 points
1 comment23 min readEA link
(manifund.substack.com)

What is up with car­bon diox­ide and cog­ni­tion? An offer

Paul_ChristianoApr 6, 2016, 1:18 AM
11 points
22 comments2 min readEA link

Altru­is­tic equity allocation

Paul_ChristianoOct 16, 2019, 5:54 AM
85 points
5 comments7 min readEA link

For­get re­place­abil­ity? (for ~com­mu­nity pro­jects)

Owen Cotton-BarrattMar 31, 2021, 2:41 PM
75 points
25 comments6 min readEA link

$10k of Ex­per­i­men­tal EA Funding

Paul_ChristianoFeb 25, 2015, 7:54 PM
19 points
29 comments1 min readEA link

Im­pact Shares For Spec­u­la­tive Projects

ElizabethSep 6, 2022, 9:20 PM
20 points
7 comments7 min readEA link
(acesounderglass.com)

[Question] Should Grants Fund EA Pro­jects Ret­ro­spec­tively?

FCCCSep 8, 2021, 2:58 AM
32 points
10 comments1 min readEA link

Jan­uary 1, 2030

Brennen HodgeOct 30, 2021, 4:53 AM
2 points
0 comments5 min readEA link

Mak­ing Im­pact Pur­chases Viable

Chris LeongApr 17, 2020, 11:01 PM
23 points
9 comments3 min readEA link

Chain­ing Retroac­tive Fun­ders to Bor­row Against Un­likely Utopias

Dawn DrescherApr 19, 2022, 6:25 PM
24 points
4 comments9 min readEA link
(impactmarkets.substack.com)

Im­pact Prizes as an al­ter­na­tive to Cer­tifi­cates of Impact

Ozzie GooenFeb 20, 2019, 9:25 PM
39 points
17 comments7 min readEA link

“Should have been hired” Prizes

LarksJan 19, 2022, 2:19 PM
38 points
4 comments3 min readEA link

The Case for Im­pact Pur­chase | Part 1

Linda LinseforsApr 14, 2020, 1:08 PM
51 points
39 comments8 min readEA link

Man­i­fund Im­pact Mar­ket /​ Mini-Grants Round On Forecasting

Scott AlexanderFeb 24, 2023, 6:14 AM
59 points
2 comments1 min readEA link
(astralcodexten.substack.com)

A $10k retroac­tive grant for VaccinateCA

AustinJul 26, 2023, 7:43 PM
58 points
0 comments6 min readEA link
(manifund.org)

A Fresh FAQ on GiveWiki and Im­pact Mar­kets Generally

Dawn DrescherApr 6, 2023, 2:02 PM
24 points
1 comment20 min readEA link
(impactmarkets.substack.com)

In­vest in ACX Grants pro­jects!

Saul MunnMar 6, 2024, 9:02 PM
41 points
5 comments3 min readEA link

Retro fun­der pro­file & Man­i­fund team recs (ACX Grants 2024: Im­pact Mar­ket)

Saul MunnMar 26, 2024, 3:29 AM
12 points
23 comments7 min readEA link

Half Price Im­pact Certificates

hbesceliApr 1, 2022, 2:23 PM
58 points
1 comment1 min readEA link

Crypto loves im­pact mar­kets: Notes from Schel­ling Point Bogotá

Rachel ShuOct 22, 2022, 3:58 PM
22 points
0 comments7 min readEA link

Re­source con­straints and lik­ing con­straints: Ad­dress­ing two is­sues with im­pact certificates

brb243Aug 22, 2022, 2:52 PM
6 points
0 comments1 min readEA link

Ex­plain­ing im­pact purchases

Ben KuhnApr 16, 2015, 12:53 AM
10 points
0 comments3 min readEA link

Do im­pact cer­tifi­cates help if you’re not sure your work is effec­tive?

Eli RoseFeb 12, 2020, 2:13 PM
21 points
12 comments1 min readEA link

Retroac­tive fund­ing with sub­sidy markets

Donald HobsonJul 16, 2022, 7:41 PM
16 points
4 comments7 min readEA link

Re­duc­ing Trans­ac­tion Costs, or Coasean Effec­tive Altruism

IvanVendrovMay 31, 2021, 1:11 AM
23 points
0 comments4 min readEA link

Retroac­tive fund­ing im­pact quan­tifi­ca­tion and maximization

brb243Jun 10, 2022, 10:33 PM
7 points
3 comments2 min readEA link

hec­toMana: tax-de­ductible gam­bling chips

Rachel WeinbergApr 1, 2023, 9:02 PM
12 points
1 comment1 min readEA link

Be­ing an in­di­vi­d­ual al­ign­ment grantmaker

A_donorFeb 28, 2022, 4:39 PM
34 points
20 comments2 min readEA link

How to al­lo­cate im­pact shares of a past project

brb243Jun 10, 2022, 10:32 PM
13 points
5 comments1 min readEA link

Link Col­lec­tion: Im­pact Markets

Saul MunnDec 26, 2023, 9:07 AM
10 points
0 comments2 min readEA link
(www.brasstacks.blog)