I’m currently a co-director at EA Netherlands (with Marieke de Visscher). We’re working to build and strengthen the EA community here.
Before this, I worked as a consultant on urban socioeconomic development projects and programmes funded by the EU. Before that, I studied liberal arts (in the UK) and then philosophy (in the Netherlands).
Hit me up if you wanna find out about the Dutch EA community! :)
That’s a very good point, perhaps the fellowships ran by the school for moral ambition is a better analogy.
Does anyone want to develop a version of Talos/Tarbell/AIM/Horizon but for comms roles?
Last year, we at EA Netherlands spent considerable time developing such a programme idea in collaboration with someone with significant experience in science and technology communications. Our funding application wasn’t successful but I think the idea still has legs, especially given the results of the MCF talent needs survey. If you’re interested, let me know and perhaps we can hand over what we developed and you can give it another go.
Should we work with EA-aligned orgs to support them methodologically with their impact management and MEL, or with non-EA orgs to motivate them to shift towards a more EA-aligned approach regarding impact management?
Not sure, both options have their merits. The Mission Motor is focused on doing the latter for animal welfare organisations, maybe touch base with them to see what their experience has been (if you haven’t already).
Do you know EA-related orgs that could need support with impact planning (e.g. with developing a Theory of Change), tracking, or analysis?
I know lots of city and national organisations funded by the Centre for Effective Altruism’s Community Building Grants programme would like to improve their M&E (including ourselves at EA Netherlands, but we’ve already got outside support). Perhaps you could contact Naomi, who is responsible for this programme.
What is your intuition on the level of capacity spent on and knowledge about impact management in EA organizations?
I’m most familiar with community-building EA organisations like ourselves. My impression is that EA CB orgs tend to do better than the average non-profit, but we’re still nowhere near as good as we ought to be.
Do you work for an organization yourself (or know one well) that might want to build a ToC with us or do a tracking or measurement workshop?
At EA Netherlands we’re already getting outside support with our M&E but I think other national organisations would be interested. Again, I’d consider contacting Naomi from CEA. Right now she’s putting together the programme for our next retreat and several requests have been made for M&E training.
Eyy! I grew up in the North East so it’s great to see this happen. Love the branding too.
Oh this is great, thanks for putting it together!
Very useful compilation, thanks for putting it together and sharing it here
There’s also a Cole Killian EA Forum account with one comment from 2022. Looks like he’s deleted things though. I googled the post ‘SBF, Pascal’s Mugging, and a Proposed Solution’ and found a dead link. It’s on Internet Archive though, you can check it here.
This is cool and I didn’t know it existed. Thanks for sharing!
How confident are respondents, or people in general, about the results of the valuable skills question? This feels particularly relevant to me at the moment as a community builder.
Could you flag which questions you felt most comfortable with? Or least comfortable with? Whichever is easier :)
Haha the power of nudges!
I think this post exemplifies great community-building practice—identifying a real gap, testing a plausible intervention, and iterating based on feedback. The Impact Workbook is a thoughtful and structured way to help students move beyond the introductory stage, and it’s really impressive to see an MVP already in action.
One thing that could make this even stronger is more explicit success metrics—this could be something relatively simple, e.g., usage stats. I also second Alex’s comment—it would be great if you had more guidance on how organisers can implement this in their own groups, perhaps a short ‘How to Get Started’?
Cheers!
Have these been published yet? Apologies if I missed this… Would be handy!
Thank you for taking the time to write and share this, as well as for the effort you put into the campaign itself! I’ve never done work like this but have always found it interesting, so this made for a fascinating read.
Yeah good Q. Let me try to explain what I’m thinking. One random offshoot that explicitly distances itself from EA might just look like an outside project. But if there are three or more such offshoots, then from an external viewpoint, they start to clump into an ‘EA diaspora,’ even if they all say they’re not part of EA. In other words, we’ve crossed a threshold from a single anomaly to a bona fide emergent ecosystem—one that might well be called a decentralised movement. Does that make sense?
Bregman is still listed as an ambassador for Doneer Effectief. He used to be heavily involved in the Tien Procent Club, but that’s no longer the case. Of course, you’re likely aware of the GWWC video he participated in. But these are all things that happened in the past.
As for SMA, the only thing they’ve done regarding EG was their collaboration with Doneer Effectief, us, and the Tien Procent Club for the recent sponsored walk. That was quite a big event, and several SMA staff members attended, but SMA didn’t make a particularly large contribution. I don’t think they’ll be involved this year. Beyond that, I don’t believe they engage with EG at all—though perhaps that will change.
Regarding the book, frustratingly, I can’t find my copy at the moment. The only part I recall is the section I mentioned previously on the Forum. That said, I hesitate to say it’s the only reference, as I might simply be more attuned to remembering the negatives.
EDIT: I forgot something! SMA did a podcast episode with the Director of Doneer Effectief, Bram. And whilst googling for that I came across this edition of their newsletter, which talks about EG.
Yeah they’re definitely not (currently) promoting E2G. In fact, IIRC, the chapter that explicitly discusses EA is quite negative about E2G-flavoured EA (primarily because of FTX).
Thanks for writing this Patrick!
While working on EA Netherlands’ annual report I wrote a small section about Rutger Bregman, the School for Moral Ambition, and how I now see EAN’s role in the Netherlands.
It’s been shared with other national organisers and with a few people in CEA, but I thought I’d post an edited version here in case it’s helpful to more people.
TL;DR: SMA is a more mainstream, career-focused offshoot: ~20 staff, three programs (outreach, community, fellowships), and an expanding audience. EA Netherlands is the nerdier cousin.
The last couple of years have seen some important changes in our operating environment, perhaps more so than in other countries. In 2022, there was a lot of hype around EA (both internationally and domestically). It was particularly big in the Netherlands because one of the country’s most prominent public intellectuals, Rutger Bregman, was beginning to advocate for it. He wrote several well-read articles for De Correspondent, discussed EA on his popular podcast, and spoke at several large events (including EAGxRotterdam).
However, this changed with the FTX scandal. By the middle of 2023, Bregman had withdrawn his wholehearted endorsement of the EA movement and had started work on his new initiative, the School for Moral Ambition (SMA). SMA launched in the Netherlands in 2024 and, while it clearly takes some inspiration from EA (alongside other movements), and several of the early key players have strong connections to EA, SMA has made significant efforts to distance itself from EA.
This has resulted in articles with headlines such as “Effective altruism is stumbling. Can ‘moral ambition’ replace it?”. On X, Bregman likens EA to the Quakers: very weird, but also very right about some of the most fundamental issues of our time. In his view, if EAs are the Quakers of the 21st century, SMAs are the Evangelicals: a movement that is broader and more ‘normie’.
In mid-2022, we thought Bregman might launch something that would result in a big spike in interest in EA in the Netherlands. By the end of the year, we no longer thought this was likely but we were unsure what exactly SMA would mean for the EA movement. This uncertainty continued throughout 2023. However, by the time we were making plans for 2024, we knew SMA wouldn’t focus on GCRs in the near future, so we made this one of our key priorities for 2024.
With SMA’s launch in 2024, we now have a more accurate picture. SMA has approximately 20 employees and three main programmes: outreach, community, and fellowships. Below is a brief description of each.
First, outreach. The accompanying book caused a big stir in the Netherlands, has already launched in Germany, and is launching in the US and UK in 2025. To give an idea of numbers, in one year they’ve gone from zero LinkedIn followers to 40,000. The book has been supplemented with marketing campaigns, media appearances, a podcast, etc. Their target audience is conventionally successful professionals: “You have a neat resume and a great job. You’re what people commonly call ‘successful.’ And yet, something gnaws at you. Does your work really make a difference? Are you using your talents for a good cause? Or has the world not really become a better place when you’ve checked off your to-do lists?”.
Second, community. This consists of an online platform, ‘Circles’, and events. A Circle is a group of six to eight people that help each other to explore how they can make the greatest impact through their work. They do so by going through the Circle programme (hosted on SMA’s website) together for 16 weeks and 8 sessions. Last I heard, 3,500 people have joined their online platform and approximately 700 people have taken part in a circle, with over 100 people taking a pledge to change their careers.
Third, fellowships. Modelled on Training for Good’s EU Tech Policy Fellowship, they’ve launched two fellowships. One combats the tobacco industry, the other aims to facilitate the transition to sustainable proteins.
So, what do I think this means for EA Netherlands?
While the School for Moral Ambition shares our commitment to prioritisation, impartial altruism, and open truthseeking, it (currently) remains limited to career guidance and does not focus on more unconvential issues such as GCR, wild animal welfare, digital sentience, etc. It is also more focused on professionals.Given this context, I now see EA Netherlands as the slightly weird and nerdy cousin of SMA (in a positive sense!). We provide a community for people who want to more rigorously explore how they can best contribute to highly neglected and sometimes unconventional causes with their careers, donations, and organising skills.
This is a pity. My impression is that you added a lot of value, and the fact you’re leaving is a signal we’ll have fewer people like you involved. It’s probably a trade-off, but I don’t know if it’s the right trade-off. Thanks for your contribution!