RSS

Hinge of history

TagLast edit: 14 Jul 2022 9:50 UTC by Leo

The hinge of history is a hypothetical time in human history in which humanity has disproportionate influence over the long-term future. The hinge of history hypothesis is the view that we are currently living at the hinge of history.[1][2] The hypothesis has been explicitly endorsed by a number of key figures in the effective altruism community, including Derek Parfit,[3][4][5] Toby Ord[6] and Holden Karnofsky,[7] and is arguably implicit in the writings of other prominent authors, such as Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nick Bostrom.

Whether the hinge of history hypothesis is true may determine how the present generation ought to prioritize between causes or choose between giving and investing, and may have other important implications.

Further reading

Fisher, Richard (2020) Are we living at the “hinge of history”?, BBC Future, September 23.

Kelsey Piper (2019) Is this the most important century in human history?, Vox, September 26.

MacAskill, William (2022) Are we living at the hinge of history?, in Jeff McMahan et al. (eds.) Ethics and Existence: The Legacy of Derek Parfit, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 331–357.

Trammell, Philip (2020) Philanthropy timing and the Hinge of History, Effective Altruism Global, February 11.

Wiblin, Robert & Keiran Harris (2020) Will MacAskill on the moral case against ever leaving the house, whether now is the hinge of history, and the culture of effective altruism, 80,000 Hours, January 24.

Related entries

cause prioritization | long-term future | patient altruism | time of perils | timing of philanthropy

  1. ^

    MacAskill, William (2019) Are we living at the most influential time in history?, Effective Altruism Forum, September 3.

  2. ^

    MacAskill, William (2022) Are we living at the hinge of history?, in Jeff McMahan et al. (eds.) Ethics and Existence: The Legacy of Derek Parfit, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 331–357.

  3. ^

    “the part of our moral theory [...] that covers how we affect future generations [...] is the most important part of our moral theory, since the next few centuries will be the most important in human history.” (Parfit, Derek (1984) Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press, p. 351)

  4. ^

    “We live during the hinge of history. Given the scientific and technological discoveries of the last two centuries, the world has never changed as fast. We shall soon have even greater powers to transform, not only our surroundings, but ourselves and our successors. If we act wisely in the next few centuries, humanity will survive its most dangerous and decisive period. Our descendants could, if necessary, go elsewhere, spreading through this galaxy.” (Parfit, Derek (2011) On What Matters, vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 616)

  5. ^

    “I think that we are living now in the most critical part of human history. The twentieth century, I think, was the best and worst of all centuries so far. But it now seems fairly likely that there are no intelligent beings anywhere else in the observable universe. Now, if that’s true, we may be living in the most critical part of the history of the universe… [The reason] why this may be the critical period in the history of the universe is if we are the only rational intelligent beings, it’s only we who might provide the origin of what would then become a galaxy-wide civilisation, which lasted for billions of years, and in which life was much better than it is for most human beings. Well, if you look at the scale there between human history so far and what could come about, it’s enormous. And what’s critical is that we could blow it, we could end it.” (Parfit, Derek (2015) Full address, Oxford Union, October 10, 12:47–15:51)

  6. ^

    Ord, Toby (2020) The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

  7. ^

    Karnofsky, Holden (2021) Roadmap for the ‘most important century’ series, Cold Takes, June 30.

Thoughts on whether we’re liv­ing at the most in­fluen­tial time in history

Buck3 Nov 2020 4:07 UTC
174 points
66 comments9 min readEA link

Are we liv­ing at the most in­fluen­tial time in his­tory?

William_MacAskill3 Sep 2019 4:55 UTC
199 points
147 comments25 min readEA link

All Pos­si­ble Views About Hu­man­ity’s Fu­ture Are Wild

Holden Karnofsky13 Jul 2021 16:57 UTC
217 points
47 comments8 min readEA link
(www.cold-takes.com)

How bad would hu­man ex­tinc­tion be?

arvomm23 Oct 2023 12:01 UTC
131 points
25 comments18 min readEA link

Cru­cial ques­tions about op­ti­mal timing of work and donations

MichaelA14 Aug 2020 8:43 UTC
45 points
4 comments27 min readEA link

Paper sum­mary: Are we liv­ing at the hinge of his­tory? (William MacAskill)

Global Priorities Institute13 Mar 2023 18:05 UTC
70 points
4 comments5 min readEA link
(globalprioritiesinstitute.org)

Chart­ing the precipice: The time of per­ils and pri­ori­tiz­ing x-risk

David Rhys Bernard24 Oct 2023 16:25 UTC
86 points
14 comments25 min readEA link

Earn­ing to give may be the best op­tion for pa­tient EAs

Jack Malde26 Dec 2021 10:26 UTC
31 points
5 comments6 min readEA link

An­nounc­ing The Most Im­por­tant Cen­tury Writ­ing Prize

michel31 Oct 2022 21:37 UTC
48 points
0 comments2 min readEA link

The most im­por­tant cen­tury and the rep­re­sen­ta­tive­ness of EA

Luke Eure28 Sep 2021 5:06 UTC
41 points
10 comments2 min readEA link

Phil Tram­mell: Philan­thropy timing and the hinge of history

EA Global11 Feb 2020 21:15 UTC
22 points
1 comment12 min readEA link
(www.youtube.com)

The case for in­vest­ing to give later

Sjir Hoeijmakers3 Jul 2020 15:23 UTC
54 points
30 comments14 min readEA link

A Toy Model of Hingeyness

Bob Jacobs7 Sep 2020 17:34 UTC
11 points
6 comments5 min readEA link

Does Eco­nomic His­tory Point Toward a Sin­gu­lar­ity?

bgarfinkel2 Sep 2020 12:48 UTC
140 points
55 comments3 min readEA link

Sum­mary of “The Precipice” (4 of 4): Our place in the story of humanity

rileyharris28 Aug 2023 2:13 UTC
6 points
0 comments5 min readEA link
(www.millionyearview.com)

Pru­den­tial im­pli­ca­tions of the Most Im­por­tant Cen­tury hypothesis

Shakked Noy2 May 2022 20:19 UTC
7 points
1 comment1 min readEA link

The emerg­ing school of pa­tient longtermism

80000_Hours7 Aug 2020 16:28 UTC
64 points
11 comments3 min readEA link

Im­por­tant, ac­tion­able re­search ques­tions for the most im­por­tant century

Holden Karnofsky24 Feb 2022 16:34 UTC
292 points
13 comments19 min readEA link

How to make the best of the most im­por­tant cen­tury?

Holden Karnofsky14 Sep 2021 21:05 UTC
54 points
5 comments12 min readEA link

Es­ti­mat­ing the Philan­thropic Dis­count Rate

MichaelDickens3 Jul 2020 16:58 UTC
79 points
21 comments37 min readEA link

Thoughts on pa­tient philanthropy

Tobias_Baumann8 Sep 2020 12:00 UTC
14 points
5 comments1 min readEA link
(s-risks.org)

Case for emer­gency re­sponse teams

Gavin5 Apr 2022 11:08 UTC
246 points
48 comments5 min readEA link

C.S. Lewis on Value Lock-In

calebo18 Dec 2021 20:00 UTC
16 points
0 comments3 min readEA link

Bibli­cal ad­vice for peo­ple with short AI timelines

Kirsten5 Dec 2021 15:38 UTC
67 points
23 comments2 min readEA link

How Im­por­tant Is This Cen­tury For Hu­man­ity?

Miguel4 Nov 2022 16:08 UTC
1 point
0 comments4 min readEA link
(www.whitehatstoic.com)

Call to Vigilance

Holden Karnofsky15 Sep 2021 18:46 UTC
79 points
4 comments3 min readEA link

[linkpost] Peter Singer: The Hinge of History

mic16 Jan 2022 1:25 UTC
38 points
8 comments3 min readEA link

The Most Im­por­tant Cen­tury: Se­quence Introduction

Holden Karnofsky3 Sep 2021 8:10 UTC
19 points
0 comments4 min readEA link

Toby Ord: Selected quo­ta­tions on ex­is­ten­tial risk

Aaron Gertler6 Aug 2020 17:41 UTC
32 points
0 comments39 min readEA link
(theprecipice.com)

Carl Shul­man on the com­mon-sense case for ex­is­ten­tial risk work and its prac­ti­cal implications

80000_Hours8 Oct 2021 13:43 UTC
41 points
2 comments150 min readEA link

Fore­cast­ing Thread: Ex­is­ten­tial Risk

amandango22 Sep 2020 20:51 UTC
24 points
4 comments2 min readEA link
(www.lesswrong.com)

Holden Karnofsky on the most im­por­tant century

80000_Hours19 Aug 2021 15:17 UTC
6 points
1 comment118 min readEA link

On fu­ture peo­ple, look­ing back at 21st cen­tury longtermism

Joe_Carlsmith22 Mar 2021 8:21 UTC
102 points
13 comments12 min readEA link

Hinges and crises

Jan_Kulveit17 Mar 2022 13:43 UTC
72 points
6 comments3 min readEA link

Grap­pling With The Hinge Of His­tory Part 1: What It Means And Why I Care

UtilityMonster14 Apr 2022 23:40 UTC
5 points
0 comments5 min readEA link

The Most Im­por­tant Cen­tury Is Not Unlikely

Maxwell Tabarrok3 Aug 2022 13:06 UTC
14 points
1 comment7 min readEA link
(maximumprogress.substack.com)

Trans­for­ma­tive AI is­sues (not just mis­al­ign­ment): an overview

Holden Karnofsky6 Jan 2023 2:19 UTC
31 points
0 comments22 min readEA link
(www.cold-takes.com)

[Question] Will the vast ma­jor­ity of tech­nolog­i­cal progress hap­pen in the longterm fu­ture?

Vasco Grilo8 Jul 2023 8:40 UTC
8 points
0 comments2 min readEA link

Prior prob­a­bil­ity of this be­ing the most im­por­tant century

Vasco Grilo15 Jul 2023 7:18 UTC
8 points
2 comments2 min readEA link

How to dis­solve moral clue­less­ness about donat­ing mosquito nets

ben.smith8 Jun 2022 7:12 UTC
25 points
8 comments12 min readEA link

The Most Im­por­tant Cen­tury: The Animation

Writer24 Jul 2022 22:34 UTC
50 points
8 comments20 min readEA link
(youtu.be)

In­vest­ing to Give: FP Re­search Report

Sjir Hoeijmakers30 Oct 2020 12:43 UTC
94 points
10 comments10 min readEA link

[Opz­ionale] Tutte le pos­si­bili con­clu­sioni sul fu­turo dell’uman­ità sono incredibili

EA Italy17 Jan 2023 14:59 UTC
1 point
0 comments8 min readEA link

Can High-Yield In­vest­ing Be the Most Good You Can Do?

Disselkoen27 Jul 2020 5:51 UTC
14 points
6 comments5 min readEA link

Vi­su­al­iza­tions of the sig­nifi­cance—per­sis­tence—con­tin­gency framework

Jakob2 Sep 2022 18:22 UTC
27 points
0 comments6 min readEA link

Why this isn’t the “most im­por­tant cen­tury”

Arjun Khemani27 Jul 2022 15:27 UTC
2 points
2 comments5 min readEA link
(arjunkhemani.com)

Don’t leave your finger­prints on the future

So8res8 Oct 2022 0:35 UTC
93 points
4 comments1 min readEA link

Grap­pling With The Hinge Of His­tory Part 2: Bayesian Dilemma

UtilityMonster19 Apr 2022 17:38 UTC
11 points
0 comments8 min readEA link

Ex­is­ten­tial risk pes­simism and the time of perils

David Thorstad12 Aug 2022 14:42 UTC
173 points
67 comments21 min readEA link

“Hinge of His­tory” Refuted

Thomas Kwa1 Apr 2021 7:00 UTC
174 points
6 comments6 min readEA link

[Question] If EAs Should In­vest, What Should We In­vest In?

Nicholas Kruus29 Dec 2023 14:51 UTC
15 points
3 comments3 min readEA link

Un ap­pello a ri­manere vigili

EA Italy18 Jan 2023 11:38 UTC
1 point
0 comments3 min readEA link

The Hinge of His­tory Hy­poth­e­sis: Re­ply to MacAskill (An­dreas Mo­gensen)

Global Priorities Institute8 Aug 2023 11:00 UTC
47 points
2 comments2 min readEA link

How tractable is chang­ing the course of his­tory?

Jamie_Harris22 May 2019 15:29 UTC
41 points
2 comments7 min readEA link
(www.sentienceinstitute.org)

How Rood­man’s GWP model trans­lates to TAI timelines

kokotajlod16 Nov 2020 14:11 UTC
22 points
0 comments3 min readEA link
No comments.