Tra­jec­tory changes

TagLast edit: 29 May 2021 15:55 UTC by MichaelA

In longtermism, trajectory changes are persistent changes to total value at every point in the long-term future. Trajectory changes have also been described as slight or significant changes to “the world’s development trajectory, or just trajectory for short”, with that referring to (Beckstead 2013):

a rough summary way the future will unfold over time. The summary includes various facts about the world that matter from a macro perspective, such as how rich people are, what technologies are available, how happy people are, how developed our science and culture is along various dimensions, and how well things are going all-things-considered at different points of time. It may help to think of the trajectory as a collection of graphs, where each graph in the collection has time on the x-axis and one of these other variables on the y-axis.

[...] If we ever prevent an existential catastrophe, that would be an extreme example of a trajectory change. There may also be smaller trajectory changes. For example, if some species of dolphins that we really loved were destroyed, that would be a much smaller trajectory change.

Most longtermist interventions focus on trajectory changes, including but not limited to existential risk reduction. However, some longtermist interventions focus on alternative objectives, such as speeding up development.


Beckstead, Nick (2013) A proposed adjustment to the astronomical waste argument, Effective Altruism Forum, May 27.

Forethought Foundation (2018) Longtermism: Potential research projects, Forethought Foundation, November.

Koehler, Arden, Benjamin Todd, Robert Wiblin & Keiran Harris (2020) Benjamin Todd on varieties of longtermism and things 80,000 Hours might be getting wrong, The 80,000 Hours Podcast, September.

Related entries

existential risk | longtermism | persistence of political/​cultural variables

A pro­posed ad­just­ment to the as­tro­nom­i­cal waste argument

Nick_Beckstead27 May 2013 4:00 UTC
15 points
1 commentEA link

A rel­a­tively athe­o­ret­i­cal per­spec­tive on as­tro­nom­i­cal waste

Nick_Beckstead6 Aug 2014 0:55 UTC
9 points
8 commentsEA link

Thoughts on “tra­jec­tory changes”

evelynciara7 Apr 2021 2:18 UTC
15 points
0 comments1 min readEA link

Model­ing the Hu­man Tra­jec­tory (Open Philan­thropy)

Aaron Gertler16 Jun 2020 9:27 UTC
49 points
4 comments2 min readEA link

[Question] Is ex­is­ten­tial risk more press­ing than other ways to im­prove the long-term fu­ture?

evelynciara20 Aug 2020 3:50 UTC
23 points
1 comment1 min readEA link

Cru­cial ques­tions for longtermists

MichaelA29 Jul 2020 9:39 UTC
76 points
16 comments19 min readEA link

Clar­ify­ing ex­is­ten­tial risks and ex­is­ten­tial catastrophes

MichaelA24 Apr 2020 13:27 UTC
24 points
3 comments7 min readEA link

“Dis­ap­point­ing Fu­tures” Might Be As Im­por­tant As Ex­is­ten­tial Risks

MichaelDickens3 Sep 2020 1:15 UTC
73 points
7 comments30 min readEA link

How can we in­fluence the long-term fu­ture?

Tobias_Baumann6 Mar 2019 15:31 UTC
10 points
1 comment4 min readEA link

How tractable is chang­ing the course of his­tory?

Jamie_Harris22 May 2019 15:29 UTC
41 points
2 comments7 min readEA link

Robert Wiblin: Mak­ing sense of long-term in­di­rect effects

EA Global6 Aug 2016 0:40 UTC
8 points
0 comments16 min readEA link

Per­ma­nent So­cietal Im­prove­ments

Larks6 Sep 2015 1:30 UTC
9 points
10 commentsEA link
No comments.