Altru­is­tic coordination

TagLast edit: 14 May 2021 19:38 UTC by EA Wiki assistant

Altruistic coordination is the study of how individual altruists should act when the impact of each person’s decisions depends on the actions of other altruists. Such coordination could take many forms, including philanthropic coordination; moral trade; attempting to consider comparative advantage and replaceability rather than just personal fit; building “community capital”; and taking a “portfolio approach” (Todd, 2018).

This coordination could be achieved via actual discussion between the relevant altruists. Alternatively, an altruist could simply try to roughly predict how their actions will affect the actions of other altruists, or follow rules of thumb intended to aid in altruistic coordination.

Altruists often fail to attempt altruistic coordination, instead taking actions based on what would be the best action if other people aiming to do good weren’t responding to what they do. Todd (2018) refers to this as “single-player thinking”. Additionally, even when a person does attempt altruistic coordination, it can be difficult to work precisely how to do so, and the communication and trust involved in good coordination can be costly to maintain. As more people try to work together to do good, it appears that achieving low-cost coordination will be a difficult but important problem to solve (see also value of movement growth).


Todd, Benjamin (2018) Doing good together—how to coordinate effectively, and avoid single-player thinking, 80,000 Hours, September 21.

Related entries

community infrastructure | epistemic deference | moral cooperation | moral trade | movement strategy | philanthropic coordination

How can we best co­or­di­nate as a com­mu­nity?

Benjamin_Todd7 Jul 2017 4:45 UTC
11 points
10 commentsEA link

[Question] What’s the best struc­ture for op­ti­mal al­lo­ca­tion of EA cap­i­tal?

Milan_Griffes4 Jun 2019 17:00 UTC
10 points
27 comments1 min readEA link

[Link post] Co­or­di­na­tion challenges for pre­vent­ing AI conflict

stefan.torges9 Mar 2021 9:39 UTC
48 points
0 comments1 min readEA link

Com­mu­nity vs Network

DavidNash12 Dec 2019 14:04 UTC
105 points
13 comments3 min readEA link

For­get re­place­abil­ity? (for ~com­mu­nity pro­jects)

Owen_Cotton-Barratt31 Mar 2021 14:41 UTC
55 points
27 comments6 min readEA link

The ca­reer co­or­di­na­tion problem

MathiasKirkBonde16 Mar 2019 19:28 UTC
49 points
9 comments2 min readEA link

Shap­ley Values Reloaded: Philantropic Co­or­di­na­tion The­ory & other mis­cel­lanea.

NunoSempere10 Mar 2020 17:36 UTC
36 points
1 comment29 min readEA link

The Case for Pro­mot­ing /​ Creat­ing Public Goods Mar­kets as a Cause Area

MikkW24 Oct 2020 5:23 UTC
31 points
2 comments14 min readEA link

[Question] What are some po­ten­tial co­or­di­na­tion failures in our com­mu­nity?

EdoArad12 Dec 2020 8:00 UTC
28 points
29 comments1 min readEA link

Creat­ing A Kick­starter for Co­or­di­nated Action

Lumpyproletariat3 Feb 2021 4:08 UTC
12 points
4 comments9 min readEA link

Ju­lia Wise: Co­or­di­nat­ing for a stronger community

EA Global6 Aug 2016 0:40 UTC
8 points
0 comments1 min readEA link

Hilary Greaves: Do­ing good to­gether — col­lec­tivism vs. coordination

EA Global3 Nov 2017 7:43 UTC
6 points
0 comments1 min readEA link

Will MacAskill: Do­ing good together

EA Global11 Aug 2017 8:19 UTC
6 points
0 comments1 min readEA link

Ben Todd: How can we best work to­gether as a com­mu­nity?

EA Global2 Jun 2017 8:48 UTC
6 points
0 comments14 min readEA link

Co­or­di­nat­ing Com­mit­ments Through an On­line Service

gabcoh5 Jan 2020 5:24 UTC
19 points
10 comments3 min readEA link

Mak­ing a Crow­dac­tion website

Bob Jacobs19 Aug 2020 15:18 UTC
14 points
2 comments5 min readEA link

Effec­tive Altru­ism and Free Riding

sbehmer27 Mar 2020 19:12 UTC
115 points
39 comments11 min readEA link