RSS

Con­straints on effec­tive altruism

TagLast edit: 13 Apr 2022 10:27 UTC by Leo

The effective altruism community requires various resources that exist in limited supply, such as talent, funding, entrepreneurship, vetting, risk tolerance, and the ability to coordinate. These resources may be seen as constraints on effective altruism, insofar as they limit the community’s capacity to attain its goals.

Consider two organizations, both of which have ten staff and would like to increase capacity:

  1. Organization A: Has annual funding of $5m, so can fund more staff, and has been actively hiring for a year, but has been unable to find anyone suitable.

  2. Organization B: Has annual funding under $1m, so can only just cover current costs. Several suitably talented individuals have made speculative applications to the organization, but the organization could not afford to hire them.

Organization A is more talent constrained than funding constrained, and vice versa for Organization B. One might also say that Organization A faces more of a talent gap and organization B faces more of a funding gap.[1] We can generalize these concepts:

These concepts are not precisely defined: rather, there tends to be a spectrum between the extremes that Organization A and Organization B occupy.

One of the key decisions people face when they want to support a cause is whether to work directly on that cause, or whether to earn to give in order to fund that cause. A key consideration relevant to this decision is whether the cause is talent constrained or funding constrained, since that will influence what kind of resource is most needed.

However, this consideration is also simplistic in some ways, and has at times been misinterpreted or misused. Todd lists nine common misconceptions related to the idea of “talent gaps”.[2] More recently, he has argued that the main bottlenecks for the effective altruism community now are neither general “talent” constraints nor funding constraints, but rather “specific skills and capacity”, such as “organizational capacity, infrastructure, and management to help train people up, as well as specialist skills that people can put to work now”[3] (see scalably using labour). It has also been suggested that the next major bottleneck might be “coordination — the ability to make sure people keep working efficiently and effectively together as the community grows”[3] (see also altruistic coordination).

Further reading

Agarwalla, Vaidehi (2020) Collection of constraints in EA, Effective Altruism Forum, July 15.

Naik, Vipul (2014) On the concept of “talent-constrained” organizations, LessWrong, March 14.
Suggests that organizations might simply not be paying enough for talent, causing talent constraints, although there are countervailing considerations.

Related entries

career choice | direct work | earning to give | effective giving | get involved | hiring | scalably using labour | working at EA vs non-EA orgs

  1. ^

    Todd, Benjamin (2015) Why you should focus more on talent gaps, not funding gaps, 80,000 Hours, November 27.

  2. ^
  3. ^

    Koehler, Arden & Keiran Harris (2020) Benjamin Todd on what the effective altruism community most needs, 80,000 Hours, November 12.

Is effec­tive al­tru­ism grow­ing? An up­date on the stock of fund­ing vs. people

Benjamin_Todd29 Jul 2021 11:47 UTC
301 points
105 comments21 min readEA link

What ar­eas are the most promis­ing to start new EA meta char­i­ties—A sur­vey of 40 EAs

Joey🔸23 Dec 2020 12:24 UTC
150 points
13 comments16 min readEA link

How are re­sources in EA al­lo­cated across is­sues?

Benjamin_Todd8 Aug 2021 12:52 UTC
131 points
27 comments9 min readEA link

Com­mu­nity Builders & Mar­keters In EA: What Are Your Bot­tle­necks?

Annabel Luketic3 May 2024 7:09 UTC
14 points
0 comments2 min readEA link

EA Lead­ers Fo­rum: Sur­vey on EA pri­ori­ties (data and anal­y­sis)

Aaron Gertler 🔸12 Nov 2019 1:14 UTC
126 points
50 comments16 min readEA link

Cross-post: Think twice be­fore talk­ing about ‘tal­ent gaps’ – clar­ify­ing nine mis­con­cep­tions, by 80,000 Hours.

80000_Hours12 Nov 2018 20:52 UTC
52 points
7 comments9 min readEA link

Key EA de­ci­sion-mak­ers on the fu­ture of EA, re­flec­tions on the past year, and more (MCF 2023)

michel3 Nov 2023 22:29 UTC
60 points
1 comment16 min readEA link

Re­sults for a sur­vey of tool use and work­flows in al­ign­ment research

jacquesthibs19 Dec 2022 15:19 UTC
30 points
0 comments1 min readEA link

Opinion: Digi­tal mar­ket­ing is un­der-uti­lized in EA

JSWinchell21 Jun 2021 16:53 UTC
195 points
29 comments3 min readEA link

EA needs more humor

SWK1 Dec 2022 5:30 UTC
35 points
14 comments5 min readEA link

Why and how to be ex­cited about megaprojects

MichaelA🔸24 Jan 2022 13:34 UTC
76 points
14 comments3 min readEA link

[Question] What’s the role of dona­tions now that the EA move­ment is richer than ever?

Richard Annilo1 Nov 2021 17:00 UTC
43 points
19 comments1 min readEA link

Per­sonal thoughts on ca­reers in AI policy and strategy

carrickflynn27 Sep 2017 16:52 UTC
56 points
28 comments18 min readEA link

[Question] Money vs Ta­lent: Put­ting num­bers on the trade­off?

Aayush Kucheria17 Apr 2022 10:50 UTC
32 points
3 comments1 min readEA link

Fu­ture Fund­ing/​Ta­lent/​Ca­pac­ity Con­straints Mat­ter, Too

MichaelDickens18 Oct 2021 22:19 UTC
34 points
5 comments3 min readEA link

On be­ing am­bi­tious: failing suc­cess­fully & less unnecessarily

Luke Freeman26 May 2022 7:21 UTC
171 points
10 comments25 min readEA link

Men­tor­ship, Man­age­ment, and Mys­te­ri­ous Old Wizards

Raemon24 Feb 2021 21:58 UTC
88 points
4 comments3 min readEA link

We can all help solve fund­ing con­straints. What stops us?

Luke Freeman18 Jun 2023 23:30 UTC
382 points
18 comments12 min readEA link

The ca­reer and the community

richard_ngo21 Mar 2019 12:35 UTC
93 points
35 comments14 min readEA link

EA is risk-constrained

EdoArad24 Jun 2020 7:54 UTC
70 points
23 comments1 min readEA link

Deal­ing with Net­work Con­straints (My Model of EA Ca­reers)

Raemon28 Feb 2019 1:34 UTC
49 points
12 comments2 min readEA link

EA Com­mu­nity Sur­vey (MCF 2023)

michel3 Nov 2023 23:18 UTC
23 points
3 comments12 min readEA link

A brain­storm of meta-EA pro­jects (MCF 2023)

michel3 Nov 2023 22:38 UTC
27 points
3 comments3 min readEA link

AI safety field-build­ing sur­vey: Ta­lent needs, in­fras­truc­ture needs, and re­la­tion­ship to EA

michel27 Oct 2023 21:08 UTC
67 points
3 comments9 min readEA link

The cur­rent limit­ing fac­tor for new charities

Joey🔸19 Mar 2024 14:40 UTC
157 points
10 comments1 min readEA link

We need more nu­ance re­gard­ing fund­ing gaps

Joey🔸12 Feb 2022 16:57 UTC
275 points
29 comments6 min readEA link

High ab­sorbency ca­reer paths

Joey🔸11 Apr 2022 14:07 UTC
197 points
7 comments3 min readEA link

[Question] Could EA be ideas con­strained?

Tom Barnes2 Nov 2021 22:59 UTC
13 points
4 comments1 min readEA link

A sub­jec­tive ac­count of what it’s like to join an EA-al­igned org with­out pre­vi­ous EA knowledge

lukasj10🔸30 Aug 2022 16:51 UTC
81 points
6 comments5 min readEA link

A Frame­work for Think­ing about the EA La­bor Market

Jon_Behar8 May 2019 19:33 UTC
83 points
58 comments12 min readEA link

A chat with Kyle Jo­hannsen, au­thor of Wild An­i­mal Ethics: The Mo­ral and Poli­ti­cal Prob­lem of Wild An­i­mal Suffering

Michael Huang18 Jun 2022 13:00 UTC
24 points
3 comments9 min readEA link

Ta­lent gaps from the per­spec­tive of a tal­ent limited or­ga­ni­za­tion.

Joey🔸3 Nov 2017 4:41 UTC
20 points
18 comments3 min readEA link

Many EA orgs say they place a lot of fi­nan­cial value on their pre­vi­ous hire. What does that mean, if any­thing? And why aren’t they hiring faster?

80000_Hours12 Oct 2018 18:55 UTC
24 points
37 comments5 min readEA link

Sur­vey of EA org lead­ers about what skills and ex­pe­rience they most need, their staff/​dona­tions trade-offs, prob­lem pri­ori­ti­sa­tion, and more.

80000_Hours9 Oct 2018 23:33 UTC
14 points
33 comments2 min readEA link

[Question] What would you like to ask a se­nior staff mem­ber who joined a new EA-al­igned org with­out pre­vi­ous EA ex­pe­rience?

lukasj10🔸28 Jul 2022 21:11 UTC
8 points
0 comments1 min readEA link

The Fu­ture of Earn­ing to Give

PeterMcCluskey13 Oct 2019 21:28 UTC
70 points
34 comments10 min readEA link
(www.bayesianinvestor.com)

A short sur­vey on bot­tle­necks in effec­tive an­i­mal ad­vo­cacy from nine at­ten­dees of Effec­tive Altru­ism Global London

Jamie_Harris24 Oct 2019 7:00 UTC
5 points
0 comments1 min readEA link
(butcantheysuffer.wordpress.com)

Bot­tle­necks and Solu­tions for the X-Risk Ecosystem

FlorentBerthet8 Oct 2018 12:47 UTC
53 points
12 comments8 min readEA link

Em­per­ors, Witches & Vege­tar­i­ans: Guilt & Virtue Aggression

Ben Evans8 Jul 2021 16:05 UTC
27 points
0 comments19 min readEA link

Why Peo­ple Use Burner Ac­counts: A Com­men­tary on Black­lists, the EA “In­ner Cir­cle”, and Funding

BurnerExplainer8 Feb 2023 7:00 UTC
48 points
98 comments6 min readEA link

“EA” doesn’t have a tal­ent gap. Differ­ent causes have differ­ent gaps.

Kat Woods20 May 2018 22:07 UTC
46 points
16 comments3 min readEA link

Effec­tive an­i­mal ad­vo­cacy bot­tle­necks surveys

Jamie_Harris13 Jan 2021 13:38 UTC
31 points
0 comments32 min readEA link
(www.animaladvocacycareers.org)

Money Can’t (Easily) Buy Talent

Mark Xu22 Jan 2021 2:56 UTC
51 points
29 comments11 min readEA link
(markxu.com)

A naive anal­y­sis on if EA is Ta­lent constrained

agent1823 Mar 2020 23:09 UTC
30 points
17 comments15 min readEA link

EA is vet­ting-constrained

toonalfrink9 Mar 2019 1:25 UTC
129 points
29 comments4 min readEA link

Re­cap—why do some or­gani­sa­tions say their re­cent hires are worth so much? (Link)

80000_Hours13 May 2019 18:01 UTC
35 points
4 comments1 min readEA link

Prob­lem anal­y­sis of the tal­ent bot­tle­neck in EAA’s

lauren_mee21 Sep 2019 10:26 UTC
61 points
7 comments6 min readEA link