RSS

His­tory of effec­tive altruism

TagLast edit: Dec 27, 2024, 9:43 PM by Sarah Cheng

Apply the history of effective altruism topic to posts about the origins and development of effective altruism. This article describes the formation of the effective altruism movement and community, some of its precursors, and some major developments from 2010-22.

Precursors

The Centre for Effective Altruism and other central EA organizations were founded in the 2000s and 2010s, but effective altruism has much earlier roots in various philosophical theories and communities related to doing good and rationality.

Ethical philosophy

Effective altruism has been influenced by older philosophical ideas and traditions.

Academic philosopher Peter Singer wrote ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’ in 1972, partly in response to a contemporary famine in Bangladesh. He argues that if one can use one’s wealth to reduce another’s extreme suffering at small cost to oneself, then one is obligated to do so. In this work, Singer introduces the well-known ‘drowning child’ thought experiment: most of us, if we passed a child drowning in a shallow pond, would consider ourselves obligated to dive in and rescue them, even if we ruined a nice suit to do so. Similarly, we should feel obligated to sacrifice luxuries to save ‘drowning children’ living far away from us: people dying of poverty, disease, or other preventable ills.[1] Written in 1996, Peter Unger’s Living High and Letting Die makes similar arguments[2]. Arguments such as these inspired philosopher Toby Ord to form the effective giving community Giving What We Can, and are often cited in effective altruism outreach.

Philosophy has also influenced effective altruists to care about the long-term future. Nick Bostrom argued in ‘Astronomical waste: The Opportunity Cost of Delayed Technological Development’ (2003) that delaying technological development might have extremely large (astronomical) opportunity costs, since it hinders humanity from colonizing the stars and creating many billions of happy lives[3]. This idea has been influential on longtermism and on many EAs who prioritize the mitigation of existential and catastrophic risks.

Many who would go on to be interested in EA congregated on Felificia, an online ‘forum for utilitarianism’. Some highly-involved EAs who were previously active on Felificia include Jacy Reese Anthis, Tom Ash, Sam Bankman-Fried, Ryan Carey, Sasha Cooper, Ruairí Donnelly, Oscar Horta, Will MacAskill, Holly Morgan, Toby Ord, Carl Shulman, Pablo Stafforini, Brian Tomasik, Rob Wiblin, Peter Wildeford, and Boris Yakubchik.[4][5][6]

Randomista development

Since the 1990s, economists working in development economics have used randomized controlled trials to test whether interventions to prevent disease or alleviate poverty actually work (some notable figures are Esther Duflo, Abhijit Banerjee and Michael Cremer). This evidence-based approach to poverty alleviation has influenced effective altruists’ work in global health and development, notably GiveDirectly, an unconditional cash transfers organization, and Charity Entrepreneurship (originally Charity Science), an organization that incubates evidence-based charities.[7]

The rationality community

From the early 2000s, the rationality community arose around the group blogs Overcoming Bias and later LessWrong. The rationality community shares with effective altruism an interest in clear and careful thinking and evidence-based reasoning, as well as a concern about severe risks from misaligned AI. The two communities have historically had a large overlap and continue to do so.

GiveWell

In 2007, charity evaluator GiveWell was founded. Some colleagues working in the finance industry had formed an informal group to research the best charitable giving opportunities, but they found that there often wasn’t good data on this. Two members of the group, Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld, funded by other members, set up GiveWell in order to research altruistic interventions full time. [8]

2009-2012: the movement crystallizes

Between 2009 and 2012, the effective altruism community began to crystallize. Many central EA organizations were founded during this period, and the name ‘effective altruism’ was first coined in 2011.

In November 2009, Giving What We Can (GWWC) was launched by Toby Ord, William McAskill and Bernadette Young. Ord wrote in September 2007: ‘As an undergraduate, I often argued into the night with my friends about political and ethical matters. I regularly received the retort: “well if you believe that, why don’t you just give all of your money to people starving in Africa”. This was meant to show that my position was absurd, but as time passed and I thought more about ethics, I found the suggestion increasingly sensible: why not indeed?’[9]

He calculated that the Fred Hollows foundation could cure someone of blindness for around £24. If he worked as a professor but continued to live a modest student lifestyle, he’d have a good life and still be able to cure around 42,000 people of blindness through donations over the course of his life. He set up GWWC to help and inspire others who were in the same position. This was a community of people committed to effective giving and giving substantial proportions of their income. Within their first year, 64 people had joined, pledging collectively $21 million.[10][11]

In February 2011, Will McAskill and Ben Todd soft-launched 80,000 Hours (then High Impact Careers), a project aiming to offer advice on how to have a positive impact with your career. At the same time, the GWWC community was growing. In August 2011, MacAskill and others were pushing for GWWC and 80,000 Hours to incorporate together as a charity, under an umbrella organization, so they could take paid staff. 17 community members voted on a name for the umbrella organization, and ‘Centre for Effective Altruism (CEA)’ won. Though CEA wasn’t intended to be a public presence, the name ‘effective altruism’ caught on.[12]

In 2011, GiveWell partnered with Good Ventures, the philanthropic foundation of Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and Cari Tuna. This partnership named itself the Open Philanthropy Project in 2014 and began operating independently in 2017.[13]

2013-2015: the movement matures

In these years, the EA movement continued to grow and come to public prominence, and a number of works that would go on to be influential were written. In 2013, Nick Beckstead published his PhD thesis ’On the overwhelming importance of shaping the far future’ and Nick Bostrom’s Superintelligence was published in 2014. [14][15]These influenced many EAs to become more interested in longtermism and AI safety respectively.


2013 saw the first EA Summit, a 7-day event in the San Francisco Bay Area organized by Leverage Research and attended by staff from the Center for Applied Rationality, the High Impact Network, GiveWell, The Life You Can Save, 80,000 Hours, Giving What We Can, Effective Animal Altruism, and the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI). Keynote speakers were Peter Singer, Peter Thiel, Jaan Tallinn, and Holden Karnofsky.[16]

In 2014, the first EA survey was run by Rethink Charity (then .impact) and Charity Science. In this survey, 813 respondents considered themselves members of the EA movement. Global poverty was the most popular cause area, and the top three charities were GiveWell’s highly-rated charities for 2013: the Against Malaria Foundation, the Schistosomiasis Control Initiative, and GiveDirectly (with MIRI the fourth largest).[17]

In 2014 the Good Done Right conference was held.[18][19]This conference focussed on moral philosophy from an EA perspective and was held in Oxford. The speakers were Elizabeth Ashford,Nick Beckstead, Nick Bostrom, Owen Cotton-Barratt,Norman Daniels, Rachel Glennerster, Michelle Hutchinson, Jeremy Lauer, Will MacAskill, Toby Ord and Derek Parfit.

In 2015, the Local Effective Altruism Network (LEAN) was formed (as a project of .impact, later Rethink Charity). It began as a grassroots project with the aim to “help local EA groups come into existence and thrive.” [20]This network seeded many local EA groups and maintained early resource collections.

In 2015, three books about EA were published: How To Be Great At Doing Good by Nick Cooney, The Most Good You Can Do by Peter Singer, and Doing Good Betterby Will MacAskill. [21][22]

2016-2022: shifting priorities and strategies

2016-2022 saw the EA movement continue to grow. More and more people identified as community members: in 2019, David Moss estimated that there were 2315 highly-engaged EAs and 4700-10,000 EAs in the community overall.[23] Some notable EA organizations founded during this period were Charity Entrepreneurship (2019) and Rethink Priorities (2018).

Shift towards longtermism and existential risk

The first EA survey in 2014 asked community members which causes they supported (they could pick multiple answers). The top cause in 2014 was global poverty, with 71% of surveyed EAs saying they supported that. Other popular cause areas were meta-charity (supported by 51%) and longtermism and existential risk (54% said they supported at least one of ‘far future’, ‘AI risk’ and ‘x-risk’).[24]

Over the following years, the proportion of community members prioritizing the far future, AI safety, and other existential risks grew slightly. In the 2019 survey, 22% of EAs reported that since joining EA, they’d changed their cause area prioritization from something else to long-term future or existential risk reduction. [25][26]

This slight shift in community sentiment was mirrored in EA philanthropy. Before 2014, GiveWell funded causes in global health and development exclusively. From around 2014, the Open Philanthropy Project (a major EA funder) increasingly began to fund interventions aimed at reducing existential risk and improving the long-term future; there also arose smaller funding bodies who prioritized the long-term future from an EA perspective (for example, the Survival and Flourishing Fund, and the FTX Foundation). In 2022, 34.3% of EA funding went to longtermism and existential risk. [27]

In 2020, Toby Ord wrote The Precipice, a book about existential risk. In 2022, Will MacAskill’s What We Owe the Future was published, making the case for longtermism to a wider audience.

From earning to give to direct work

Earning to give is the idea that one can have an outsized positive impact by taking a high-paying job in an industry such as finance or tech, and donating large portions of one’s income to effective charities. Earning to give was popular early on in EA, but central EA organizations gradually de-emphasised this strategy, starting in around 2015. This was in part because billionaire funders such as Dustin Moskovitz and (later) Sam Bankman-Fried had become interested in EA and committed large amounts of funding; funding seemed abundant, whereas people with the skills and inclination to actually solve the world’s pressing problems were more scarce.[28][29]

There may also have been more opportunities for EAs to work directly on pressing issues, or on community building and ‘meta’ work, as the EA community grew. It’s possible that the shift was related to the fact that more EAs became interested in longtermism and AI safety; compared to global development, these fields had relatively small funding gaps, but a large need for talent, since they are less well-known cause areas and since much AI safety work requires deep technical expertise.[30]

Public reception

In the later 2010s and early 2020s, EA received more media attention than it had previously, both positive and negative. For example, the New Yorker published a positive profile of Will MacAskill in August 2022, [31] whereas in February 2023 Time published an expose of alleged sexual harassment and abuse within the community.[32]

FTX crisis

The EA community faced a significant crisis in late 2022 and 2023 when the FTX cryptocurrency exchange went bankrupt and CEO Sam Bankman-Fried was accused of fraud. Prior to the crisis, Bankman-Fried had been a well-respected member of the EA community, and his FTX Foundation had been a significant source of funding for EA projects, so the crisis caused both practical disruption and emotional distress.

Further reading

Angot, Eve-Léana & Elise Cathala (2019) Chronologie du mouvement de l’altruisme efficace, Altruisme Efficace France, October 14.

Anthis, Jacy Reese (2022) Some early history of effective altruism, Jacy Reese Anthis’s Website, May 15 (updated 7 June 2022).

Carey, Ryan (2022) Comments on Jacy Reese Anthis’ “Some early history of effective altruism”, Effective Altruism Forum, July 2.

Kaufman, Jeff (2013) My effective altruism timeline, Jeff Kaufman’s Blog, August 10.

MacAskill, William (2014) The history of the term “effective altruism”, Effective Altruism Forum, March 10.

Matthews, Dylan (2022) How effective altruism went from a niche movement to a billion-dollar force, Vox, August 8.

Rice, Issa et al (2017) Timeline of effective altruism, Timelines Wiki (updated June 2021).

Sinick, Jonah (2013) A personal history of involvement with effective altruism, LessWrong, June 11.

  1. ^

    Peter Singer (1972) Famine, Affluence, and Morality

  2. ^
  3. ^
  4. ^
  5. ^
  6. ^
  7. ^

    Altruism Efficace France (2019) Chronologie du mouvement de l’altruisme efficace, Medium

  8. ^

    GiveWell (2018) Our Story | GiveWell

  9. ^

    Toby Ord (2007) An even more ambitious pledge, Felificia

  10. ^

    Giving What We Can, Our history

  11. ^

    Giving What We Can, Who started Giving What We Can?

  12. ^
  13. ^
  14. ^
  15. ^
  16. ^

    Nnevvinn (2013) Effective Altruism Summit 2013, YouTube

  17. ^
  18. ^
  19. ^

    Pablo Stafforini (2020) Good Done Right, Pablo’s miscellany

  20. ^
  21. ^

    Nick Cooney (2015) How to Be Great at Doing Good, Wiley

  22. ^
  23. ^
  24. ^

    Peter Hurford, Jacy Reese, David Moss, and Robert Krzyzanowski, The 2014 Survey of Effective Altruists: Results and Analysis

  25. ^

    42% of surveyed EAs reported that they’d changed their cause area focus, and 54% of them reported that the change was from something else to longtermism, existential risk or related causes.

  26. ^
  27. ^
  28. ^
  29. ^
  30. ^
  31. ^
  32. ^

Related entries

effective altruism | Felicifia | history | history of existential risk | social and intellectual movements | community | criticism of effective altruism

The his­tory of the term ‘effec­tive al­tru­ism’

William_MacAskillMar 11, 2014, 2:03 AM
54 points
9 comments4 min readEA link

David Ed­monds’s bi­og­ra­phy of Parfit is out

PabloApr 23, 2023, 12:25 PM
115 points
2 comments4 min readEA link

When Did EA Start?

Jeff Kaufman 🔸Jan 25, 2023, 2:51 PM
117 points
12 comments1 min readEA link

Timeline of the wild-an­i­mal suffer­ing movement

Louis_FranciniJun 16, 2020, 6:49 AM
57 points
9 comments1 min readEA link
(timelines.issarice.com)

William Rath­bone: 19th-cen­tury effec­tive al­tru­ist?

Aaron Gertler 🔸Jul 30, 2019, 6:14 AM
20 points
2 comments3 min readEA link
(lukemuehlhauser.com)

[Question] What are novel ma­jor in­sights from longter­mist macros­trat­egy or global pri­ori­ties re­search found since 2015?

Max_DanielAug 13, 2020, 9:15 AM
88 points
56 comments1 min readEA link

[Question] What’s the so­cial/​his­tor­i­cal story of EA’s longter­mist turn?

David MFeb 6, 2023, 4:38 PM
26 points
10 comments2 min readEA link

Com­plete archive of the Feli­ci­fia forum

Louis_FranciniMay 30, 2020, 10:14 AM
115 points
1 comment1 min readEA link

Help writ­ing a His­tory of Effec­tive Altru­ism?

Wil PerkinsFeb 8, 2023, 6:35 PM
18 points
7 comments1 min readEA link

Book Re­view: Deon­tol­ogy by Jeremy Bentham

ketchupduckAug 12, 2020, 1:45 PM
50 points
10 comments16 min readEA link

[link post] How effec­tive al­tru­ism went from a niche move­ment to a billion-dol­lar force

Tobias HäberliAug 8, 2022, 2:56 PM
79 points
1 comment4 min readEA link
(www.vox.com)

[Question] What ex­actly did FTX do wrong?

Transient AltruistMar 30, 2024, 7:39 PM
39 points
31 comments1 min readEA link

EA 1.0 and EA 2.0; high­light­ing crit­i­cal changes in EA’s evolution

DMMFAug 10, 2022, 12:29 AM
28 points
21 comments2 min readEA link

Gor­don Ir­lam: an effec­tive al­tru­ist ahead of his time

Louis_FranciniJun 10, 2020, 8:48 PM
97 points
4 comments2 min readEA link

Hits-based Giving

Holden KarnofskyApr 4, 2016, 7:45 AM
99 points
2 comments19 min readEA link
(www.openphilanthropy.org)

[Question] What ma­te­rial should we cross-post for the Fo­rum’s archives?

Aaron Gertler 🔸Apr 15, 2021, 10:06 AM
28 points
6 comments1 min readEA link

EA Pro­jects I’d Like to See

finmMar 13, 2022, 6:12 PM
153 points
42 comments27 min readEA link
(www.finmoorhouse.com)

Col­lec­tion of good 2012-2017 EA fo­rum posts

sauliusJul 10, 2020, 4:35 PM
202 points
8 comments3 min readEA link

Red Team­ing CEA’s Com­mu­nity Build­ing Work

AnonymousEAForumAccountSep 1, 2022, 2:42 PM
296 points
68 comments66 min readEA link

Les­sons from the his­tory of an­i­mal rights

JesseCliftonMay 17, 2016, 7:32 PM
46 points
10 comments9 min readEA link

What the EA com­mu­nity can learn from the rise of the neoliberals

Kerry_VaughanDec 6, 2016, 6:21 PM
55 points
10 comments20 min readEA link

Will MacAskill: Open­ing talk (2015)

EA GlobalAug 28, 2015, 8:37 AM
7 points
0 comments1 min readEA link
(www.youtube.com)

CEA Disambiguation

Jeff Kaufman 🔸Dec 19, 2022, 1:27 PM
134 points
57 comments1 min readEA link

I want an ethnog­ra­phy of EA

Holly Elmore ⏸️ 🔸May 2, 2019, 8:33 PM
83 points
41 comments1 min readEA link

Dorothea Brooke: an al­ter­na­tive ori­gin story for Effec­tive Altruism

Bernadette_YoungJan 25, 2015, 8:26 PM
45 points
20 comments8 min readEA link

Will MacAskill: Why should effec­tive al­tru­ists em­brace un­cer­tainty?

EA GlobalJun 8, 2018, 7:26 PM
7 points
0 comments8 min readEA link
(www.youtube.com)

Rho­dri Davies on why he’s not an EA

SanjayAug 18, 2022, 11:50 AM
105 points
19 comments2 min readEA link
(whyphilanthropymatters.com)

Snap­shot of a ca­reer choice 10 years ago

Julia_Wise🔸Sep 23, 2021, 7:05 PM
237 points
12 comments3 min readEA link

Phil Har­vey (1938 − 2021)

technicalitiesMar 4, 2022, 7:06 PM
120 points
4 comments2 min readEA link

Some­one should write a de­tailed his­tory of effec­tive altruism

Pete RowlettJan 14, 2023, 10:30 PM
54 points
16 comments1 min readEA link

GWWC Pledge History

Jeff Kaufman 🔸Jan 24, 2023, 3:54 PM
49 points
5 comments1 min readEA link

“Go­ing In­finite”—New book on FTX/​SBF re­leased to­day + my TL;DR

Nicky PochinkovOct 3, 2023, 10:10 PM
65 points
24 comments2 min readEA link

EA EDA: What do Fo­rum Topics tell us about changes in EA?

JWS 🔸Jul 14, 2023, 7:54 PM
104 points
6 comments7 min readEA link

Effec­tive Altru­ism and the strate­gic am­bi­guity of ‘do­ing good’

Jeroen De Ryck 🔹Jul 17, 2023, 7:24 PM
81 points
10 comments2 min readEA link
(medialibrary.uantwerpen.be)

Third Wave Effec­tive Altruism

Ben_West🔸Jun 17, 2023, 3:45 PM
225 points
46 comments3 min readEA link

The flow of fund­ing in EA move­ment building

Vaidehi Agarwalla 🔸Jun 23, 2023, 3:45 AM
206 points
33 comments10 min readEA link

Be­fore There Was Effec­tive Altru­ism, There Was Effec­tive Philanthropy

ColdButtonIssuesJun 26, 2022, 6:09 PM
134 points
7 comments12 min readEA link

Fu­ture of Hu­man­ity In­sti­tute 2005-2024: Fi­nal Report

PabloApr 17, 2024, 2:25 PM
224 points
89 comments5 min readEA link
(static1.squarespace.com)

EA EDA: Look­ing at Fo­rum trends across 2023

JWS 🔸Jun 11, 2024, 6:34 PM
102 points
8 comments9 min readEA link

The Protester, Priest and Poli­ti­cian: Effec­tive Altru­ists be­fore their time

NickLaingSep 5, 2024, 11:50 AM
119 points
18 comments7 min readEA link
(christandcounterfactuals.substack.com)

[Linkpost] Leif We­nar’s The Deaths of Effec­tive Altruism

EarthlingMar 27, 2024, 3:35 PM
46 points
58 comments1 min readEA link
(www.wired.com)

Will Maskill Gave Up on Utili­tar­i­anism (and the rest of us are soon to fol­low)

johnburidanJul 11, 2022, 2:10 AM
−1 points
7 comments3 min readEA link

Donare sulla base dei suc­cessi (Hits-based Giv­ing)

EA ItalyDec 31, 2022, 4:23 AM
1 point
0 comments20 min readEA link

Book Re­view: Churchill and Orwell

SammyDMartinOct 10, 2021, 11:06 AM
28 points
0 comments11 min readEA link

Book Re­view: Prin­ci­ples of Mo­rals and Leg­is­la­tion by Jeremy Bentham

ketchupduckJun 17, 2021, 1:49 AM
20 points
0 comments8 min readEA link

[Linkpost] John Wesley’s sur­pris­ingly EA-al­igned views on the use of money

EA for ChristiansSep 28, 2023, 4:09 PM
32 points
1 comment13 min readEA link
(christandcounterfactuals.substack.com)

How Effec­tive Altru­ists In­fluenced Vi­talik Bu­terin to donate $1 Billion in Crypto Meme Coins

EAHistorianJan 5, 2025, 7:55 AM
64 points
4 comments2 min readEA link

Reli­gious Texts and EA: What Can We Learn and What Can We In­form?

Tony.SenaJan 30, 2021, 12:04 PM
29 points
11 comments5 min readEA link

Un­pack­ing Martin Sandbu’s re­cent(ish) take on EA

JWS 🔸Jan 20, 2024, 1:16 AM
68 points
2 comments15 min readEA link

His­tory of Effec­tive Altruism

James NorrisFeb 5, 2025, 4:00 PM
8 points
0 comments3 min readEA link

EA In­ter­view Series: Michelle Hutch­in­son, De­cem­ber 2015

JacyDec 22, 2015, 3:46 PM
23 points
6 comments7 min readEA link

Ber­trand Rus­sell on statis­ti­cal empathy

jonathanstraySep 28, 2015, 4:16 PM
30 points
5 comments1 min readEA link

Scien­tific Char­ity Movement

Jeff Kaufman 🔸Jul 23, 2016, 2:33 PM
40 points
6 comments7 min readEA link

The 3rd wave of EA is com­ing—what does it mean for you?

JakobAug 19, 2022, 1:47 PM
44 points
4 comments5 min readEA link

[Question] Map­ping of EA

Charlie DoughertyDec 2, 2021, 10:25 AM
17 points
7 comments1 min readEA link
No comments.